Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32845366›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Recent progress and trends in the analysis and identification of rhamnolipids.

Jingjing Jiang, Mingjie Jin, Xiaoyi Li, Qin Meng, Jian Niu, Xuwei Long

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent fermentation developments for improved rhamnolipid production.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Valorization of oily sludge waste using biosurfactant-producing bacteria.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rhamnolipid Micellization and Adsorption Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingjing JiangSchool of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei Road, Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China.
Mingjie JinSchool of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei Road, Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyi LiHangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qin MengSchool of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jian NiuSchool of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei Road, Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China.
Xuwei LongSchool of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei Road, Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China. xuweilong@njust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8586-7425

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 30916011311National Natural Science Foundation of China 51778293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhamnolipids have extensive potential applications and are the most promising biosurfactants for commercialization. The efficient and accurate identification and analysis of these are important to their production, application and commercialization. Accordingly, significant efforts have been made to identify and analyse rhamnolipids during screening of producing strains, fermentation and application processes. Cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-methylene blue (CTAB-MB) test combines a series of indirect assays to efficiently assist in the primary screening of rhamnolipids-producing strains, while the secretion of rhamnolipids by these strains can be identified through TLC, FTIR, NMR, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and HPLC-MS analysis. Rhamnolipids can be quantified by colorimetric methods requiring the use of concentrated acid, and this approach has the advantages of reliability, simplicity, low-cost and excellent reproducibility with very low technological requirements. HPLC-MS can also be employed as required as a more accurate quantification method. In addition, HPLC-ELSD has been established as the internationally acceptable measure of rhamnolipids for commercial purposes. The preparation of well-accepted rhamnolipids standards and modifications of analysis operations are essential to further enhance the accuracy and improve the simplicity of rhamnolipid analysis.Key points• Current status of R&D works on determination of rhamnolipids is listed• Advantages and disadvantages of various types analysis are summarized• Limitations of current rhamnolipid quantification are discussed Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

GlycolipidsPseudomonas aeruginosaChromatography, High Pressure LiquidReproducibility of ResultsGlycolipidsrhamnolipidAnalysisColorimetric methodsIdentificationRhamnolipids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.