Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32845356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

Validation of Roebuck 1518 synthetic chamois as a skin simulant when backed by 10% gelatin.

Amy Pullen, David C Kieser, Gary Hooper

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Kinetic energy evolution and injury assessment of high-speed tear jets.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy PullenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago, P O Box 4545, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. a.pullen@dta.mil.nz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-2533
David C KieserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago, P O Box 4545, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Gary HooperDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago, P O Box 4545, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSynthetic skin simulants are used both in wound ballistics and forensic investigations and should display similar mechanical properties to human tissue and therefore need to be validated. It is recognised that skin simulants may have a significantly different performance when different backing combinations are used; therefore, it is essential to specify and control the backing material. Roebuck 1518 synthetic chamois (RBK) backed by 20% ballistic gelatin has been validated as a suitable skin simulant; this study looks at validating the RBK simulant when backed by 10% ballistic gelatin.

methodsTwo layers of RBK synthetic chamois backed by calibrated 10% ballistic gelatin were placed onto the long face of the block and secured. Steel spheres with various sectional densities were fired using a custom-made gas gun to determine the V

resultsThe results demonstrate that for a sectional density between 2.1 and 6.6 g/cm

conclusionsThis validation study confirms that RBK synthetic simulant backed by 10% gelatin is a suitable skin simulant when testing non-deforming projectiles with sectional densities ranging from 2.1 to 6.6 g/cm

Indexed as

Forensic BallisticsModels, BiologicalAnimalsGelatinHumansReproducibility of ResultsRupicapraSkinWounds, GunshotGelatinGelatinSimulantSkinSyntheticValidation

Identifiers

PMID32845356
OpenAlexW3081173786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.