Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32845080›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2020

Community standards to facilitate development and address challenges in metabolic modeling.

Maureen A Carey, Andreas Dräger, Moritz E Beber, Jason A Papin, James T Yurkovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genome-scale model ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genome-scale metabolic models consistently predictFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maureen A CareyDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-5445
Andreas DrägerComputational Systems Biology of Infection and Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens, Institute for Biomedical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-5553
Moritz E BeberNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-1978
Jason A PapinDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-5805
James T YurkovichInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-509X

Funding

Continued Support of Essential SBML Software and Community ResourcesR01GM070923 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HUCKA, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2018
$8.0M
Systems biology of microbe-mediated glucosinolate bioconversion in inflammatory bowel diseaseR01AT010253 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010253NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070923NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardization of data and models facilitates effective communication, especially in computational systems biology. However, both the development and consistent use of standards and resources remain challenging. As a result, the amount, quality, and format of the information contained within systems biology models are not consistent and therefore present challenges for widespread use and communication. Here, we focused on these standards, resources, and challenges in the field of constraint-based metabolic modeling by conducting a community-wide survey. We used this feedback to (i) outline the major challenges that our field faces and to propose solutions and (ii) identify a set of features that defines what a "gold standard" metabolic network reconstruction looks like concerning content, annotation, and simulation capabilities. We anticipate that this community-driven outline will help the long-term development of community-inspired resources as well as produce high-quality, accessible models within our field. More broadly, we hope that these efforts can serve as blueprints for other computational modeling communities to ensure the continued development of both practical, usable standards and reproducible, knowledge-rich models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, GeneticSoftwareSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID32845080
PMCPMC8411906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.