Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32844403›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2021

Validation of a clinicopathological and gene expression profile model for sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma.

E E A P Mulder, J T Dwarkasing, D Tempel, A van der Spek, L Bosman, D Verver, A L Mooyaart, A A M van der Veldt, C Verhoef, T E C Nijsten and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06566404 (Gene Expression Profiles and ctDNA for Risk Stratification in Patients With Melanoma Eligible for Lymph Node Sentinel Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06566404 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Gene Expression Profiles and ctDNA for Risk Stratification in Patients With Melanoma Eligible for Lymph Node Sentinel Biopsy (CORRESPOND): an Observational Prospective Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2024 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsMelanoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A deep learning-clinical nomogram hybrid for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. [A multi-molecular predictive model for lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on machine learning algorithms].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rapidly Evolving Pre- and Post-surgical Systemic Treatment of Melanoma.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. LncRNA LINC00847 Accelerates Melanoma Progression by Regulating MiR-133a-3p/TGFBR1 Axis.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E E A P MulderDepartments of, Department of, Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9045-2171
J T DwarkasingDepartment of Scientific & Clinical Development, SkylineDx, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
D TempelDepartment of Scientific & Clinical Development, SkylineDx, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A van der SpekDepartment of Scientific & Clinical Development, SkylineDx, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
L BosmanDepartment of Scientific & Clinical Development, SkylineDx, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
D VerverDepartments of, Department of, Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A L MooyaartDepartment of, Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A A M van der VeldtDepartment of, Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
C VerhoefDepartments of, Department of, Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
T E C NijstenDepartment of, Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-2875
D J GrunhagenDepartments of, Department of, Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
L M HollesteinDepartment of, Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-6791
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

Netherlands National Enterprising Agency (RVO)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Clinicopathological and Gene Expression Profile (CP-GEP) model was developed to accurately identify patients with T1-T3 primary cutaneous melanoma at low risk for nodal metastasis.

objectivesTo validate the CP-GEP model in an independent Dutch cohort of patients with melanoma.

methodsPatients (aged ≥ 18 years) with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2007 and 2017 at the Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute were eligible. The CP-GEP model combines clinicopathological features (age and Breslow thickness) with the expression of eight target genes involved in melanoma metastasis (ITGB3, PLAT, SERPINE2, GDF15, TGFBR1, LOXL4, CXCL8 and MLANA). Using the pathology result of SLNB as the gold standard, performance measures of the CP-GEP model were calculated, resulting in CP-GEP high risk or low risk for nodal metastasis.

resultsIn total, 210 patients were included in the study. Most patients presented with T2 (n = 94, 45%) or T3 (n = 70, 33%) melanoma. Of all patients, 27% (n = 56) had a positive SLNB, with nodal metastasis in 0%, 30%, 54% and 16% of patients with T1, T2, T3 and T4 melanoma, respectively. Overall, the CP-GEP model had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77·9-96.2], with an NPV of 100% (95% CI 72·2-100) in T1, 89·3% (95% CI 72·8-96·3) in T2 and 75·0% (95% CI 30·1-95·4) in T3 melanomas. The CP-GEP indicated high risk in all T4 melanomas.

conclusionsThe CP-GEP model is a noninvasive and validated tool that accurately identified patients with primary cutaneous melanoma at low risk for nodal metastasis. In this validation cohort, the CP-GEP model has shown the potential to reduce SLNB procedures in patients with melanoma.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32844403
PMCPMC8247350
OpenAlexW3080832806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.