ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2021
Health outcomes in offspring born to survivors of childhood cancers following assisted reproductive technologies.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of previous history of malignant tumors/precancerous lesions on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Infertility, the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies use in childhood cancer survivors: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation: a two-decade single-center experience with 451 children and adolescents.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- An Assessment of Cryopreserved Semen and Testicular Tissue Collected Before and After Cancer Treatment Initiation.Cancer management and research · 2024Article
- Sperm and testicular tissue cryopreservation and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in male cancer patients: a 15-year experience.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Parenthood for childhood cancer survivors: unfounded fear of cancer development in offspring and related health behaviors.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology by European Childhood Cancer Survivors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Fertility preservation in the pediatric population-experience from a German Cryobank for ovarian tissue.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Fertility Counseling in Survivors of Cancer in Childhood and Adolescence: Time for a Reappraisal?Cancers · 2021Article
- Update and new advances in fertility preservation and cancer.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAn increasing number of childhood cancer survivors are using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to overcome treatment-related fertility impairment. We report perinatal and health outcomes of offspring born to survivors following ART.
methodsThe FeCt Multicenter Offspring Study surveyed the health of offspring of childhood cancer survivors. Health outcomes in offspring born to survivors following ART (n = 57, 4.6%) or after spontaneous conception (n = 1182) were assessed in the German cohort (n = 1239) using bivariate analysis. Findings were put into the context of the general German population by health outcome assessment in 1:1 matched-pair analysis (n = 2478).
resultsNearly twice the survivors used ART compared with numbers reported for the German general population (4.6% vs. 2.6%). Successful pregnancies were achieved after a median of two cycles, mainly using non-cryopreserved oocytes/sperm. Multiple sibling births (p < 0.001, 28.1% vs. 3.0%) and low birth weight (p = 0.008; OR = 2.659, 95% CI = 1.258-5.621) occurred significantly more often in offspring born to survivors who utilized ART than spontaneously conceived children, whereas similar percentages were born preterm or too small for their gestational age. ART did not increase the prevalence of childhood cancer or congenital malformations in offspring born to survivors.
conclusionART use by childhood cancer survivors was successful with both fresh and cryopreserved oocytes/sperm, and did not influence perinatal health or health outcomes when known confounders were taken into account. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Oncofertility is an important component of patient care. Our study implicates that the utilization of ART by adult survivors of childhood cancer does not put offspring at additional risk for adverse perinatal or health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.