ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020
Is Any Cardiovascular Disease-Specific DNA Methylation Biomarker Within Reach?
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted DNA Demethylation: Vectors, Effectors and Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- DNA Methylation Alterations in Fractionally Irradiated Rats and Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewA detailed understanding of the epigenome of cardiovascular disease (CVD) should broaden current insights into mechanisms of atherogenesis and help identify suitable biomarkers for disease risk and progression. This review addresses the question whether a consensus has been reached on identifying the main aberrant DNA methylation profile in CVD. Additionally, it presents advances and setbacks in the search for specific CVD biomarkers. RECENT
findingsAlthough the literature points to DNA hypermethylation as an epigenetic landmark of CVD, inconsistencies are significant. In particular, the DNA methylomes of peripheral blood cells and the vascular wall do not show a consistent direction of change in all studies. An additional significant hurdle is the relatively low study-to-study reproducibility and the difficulty to assess specificity for CVD. Nonetheless, a number of biologically plausible markers have been proposed that warrant further studies. An integrated model for dynamic changes of DNA methylation during the natural history of atherosclerosis predisposition and progression is presented, that might reconcile conflicting findings. Cohort design and technical criteria for DNA methylation analysis need to be further homogenized to allow for meaningful validation. As stable DNA methylation profiles are likely determined by genetic variants, many of which might control a range of diseases, it is anticipated that CVD biomarker discovery will be a delicate balancing act between reproducibility and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.