ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2021
Native vs. active vitamin D in children with chronic kidney disease: a cross-over study.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical relevance of native vitamin D in pediatric kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rationale for the prescription of vitamin D analogues in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is still a matter of debate. We aimed to compare native vs. active forms of vitamin D on pre-dialysis children with CKD and evaluate effects on calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and parathyroid hormone (PTH).
methodsThirty children with pre-dialysis CKD were enrolled in a prospective cross-over study. Patients were randomly classified into two groups. Group A received native cholecalciferol while group B received alfacalcidol for 3 months. After 1 month (washout period), patients were switched to receive the opposite form for another 3 months. Serum Ca, P, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), PTH, and 25(OH)D
resultsThere was significant increase in levels of 25(OH)D
conclusionAlfacalcidol and native vitamin D3 were equally effective in decreasing PTH levels and increasing serum 25(OH)D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.