Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32844277›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2020

The role of the l-IPS in the comprehension of reversible and irreversible sentences: an rTMS study.

Lorenzo Vercesi, Prerana Sabnis, Chiara Finocchiaro, Luigi Cattaneo, Elena Tonolli, Gabriele Miceli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo VercesiCIMeC-Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy. lorenzo.vercesi@unitn.it.
Prerana SabnisCIMeC-Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Chiara FinocchiaroDipSCo, Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Luigi CattaneoCIMeC-Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Elena TonolliCIMeC-Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Gabriele MiceliCIMeC-Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
University of Trento · ITAccademia Nazionale dei Lincei · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thematic roles can be seen as semantic labels assigned to who/what is taking part in the event denoted by a verb. Encoding thematic relations is crucial for sentence interpretation since it relies on both syntactic and semantic aspects. In previous studies, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left inferior intraparietal sulcus (l-IPS) selectively influenced performance accuracy on reversible passive (but not active) sentences. The effect was attributed to the fact that in these sentences the assignment of the agent and theme roles requires re-analysis of the first-pass sentence parsing. To evaluate the role of reversibility and non-canonical word order (passive voice) on the effect, rTMS was applied over l-IPS during a sentence comprehension task that included reversible and irreversible, active and passive sentences. Participants were asked to identify who/what was performing the action or who/what the action was being performed on. Stimulation of the l-IPS increased response time on reversible passive sentences but not on reversible active sentences. Importantly, no effect was found on irreversible sentences, irrespective of sentence diathesis.Results suggest that neither reversibility nor sentence diathesis alone are responsible for the effect and that the effect is likely to be triggered/constrained by a combination of semantic reversibility and non-canonical word order. Combined with the results of previous studies, and irrespective of the specific role of each feature, these findings support the view that the l-IPS is critically involved in the assignment of thematic roles in reversible sentences.

Indexed as

AdultComprehensionFemaleHumansLanguageLanguage TestsMaleParietal LobeReaction TimeSpeech PerceptionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultl-IPSrTMSSemantic reversibilitySentence processingThematic role assignment

Identifiers

PMID32844277
PMCPMC7544754
OpenAlexW3080156720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.