Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32844247›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Understanding burnout and moral distress to build resilience: a qualitative study of an interprofessional intensive care unit team.

Jennifer Hancock, Tobias Witter, Scott Comber, Patricia Daley, Kim Thompson, Stewart Candow, Gisele Follett, Walter Somers, Corry Collins, Janet White and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New approach to assessing and addressing moral distress in intensive care unit personnel: a case study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Reflection, refraction, resilience: the transformative potential of art.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer HancockDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, 1276 South Park St., Halifax, NS, B3H 2Y9, Canada. Jennifer.hancock@nshealth.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-8174
Tobias WitterDepartment of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management & Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Scott ComberRowe School of Business, Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Patricia DaleyMSNICU, Health Sciences Centre, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kim ThompsonRespiratory Therapy Department, Central Zone, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Stewart CandowIntensive Care Unit, Health Sciences Centre, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Gisele FollettRespiratory Therapy DGH, Health Sciences Centre, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Walter SomersHealth Sciences Centre, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Corry CollinsCLU, Health Sciences Centre, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Janet WhiteRespiratory Therapy DGH, Health Sciences Centre, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Olga KitsResearch Methods Unit, Research, Innovation & Discovery, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CADalhousie University · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CA

Funding

QEII Foundation 893267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to explore personal and organizational factors that contribute to burnout and moral distress in a Canadian academic intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare team. Both of these issues have a significant impact on healthcare providers, their families, and the quality of patient care. These themes will be used to design interventions to build team resilience.

methodsThis is a qualitative study using focus groups to elicit a better understanding of stakeholder perspectives on burnout and moral distress in the ICU team environment. Thematic analysis of transcripts from focus groups with registered intensive care nurses (RNs), respiratory therapists (RTs), and physicians (MDs) considered causes of burnout and moral distress, its impact, coping strategies, as well as suggestions to build resilience.

resultsSix focus groups, each with four to eight participants, were conducted. A total of 35 participants (six MDs, 21 RNs, and eight RTs) represented 43% of the MDs, 18.8% of the RNs, and 20.0% of the RTs. Themes were concordant between the professions and included: 1) organizational issues, 2) exposure to high-intensity situations, and 3) poor team experiences. Participants reported negative impacts on emotional and physical well-being, family dynamics, and patient care. Suggestions to build resilience were categorized into the three main themes: organizational issues, exposure to high intensity situations, and poor team experiences.

conclusionsIntensive care unit team members described their experiences with moral distress and burnout, and suggested ways to build resilience in the workplace. Experiences and suggestions were similar between the interdisciplinary teams.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalMoralsAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaHumansIntensive Care UnitsStress, PsychologicalBurnoutICU teammoral distressresiliency

Identifiers

PMID32844247
OpenAlexW3081294124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.