Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32844064›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The Bayesian confidence intervals for measuring the difference between dispersions of rainfall in Thailand.

Noppadon Yosboonruang, Sa-Aat Niwitpong, Suparat Niwitpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noppadon YosboonruangDepartment of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sa-Aat NiwitpongDepartment of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-3397
Suparat NiwitpongDepartment of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-1131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coefficient of variation is often used to illustrate the variability of precipitation. Moreover, the difference of two independent coefficients of variation can describe the dissimilarity of rainfall from two areas or times. Several researches reported that the rainfall data has a delta-lognormal distribution. To estimate the dynamics of precipitation, confidence interval construction is another method of effectively statistical inference for the rainfall data. In this study, we propose confidence intervals for the difference of two independent coefficients of variation for two delta-lognormal distributions using the concept that include the fiducial generalized confidence interval, the Bayesian methods, and the standard bootstrap. The performance of the proposed methods was gauged in terms of the coverage probabilities and the expected lengths via Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation studies shown that the highest posterior density Bayesian using the Jeffreys' Rule prior outperformed other methods in virtually cases except for the cases of large variance, for which the standard bootstrap was the best. The rainfall series from Songkhla, Thailand are used to illustrate the proposed confidence intervals.

Indexed as

Bootstrap methodCoefficient of variationFiducial generalized confidence intervalJeffreys’ Rule priorThe left-invariant Jeffreys priorUniform prior

Identifiers

PMID32844064
PMCPMC7415225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.