Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843986›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2020

Social Support in the Peritoneal Dialysis Experience: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Danielle E Fox, Robert R Quinn, Matthew T James, Lorraine Venturato, Kathryn M King-Shier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient perspectives on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the PD catheter: Strategies and Solutions.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle E FoxFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-4951
Robert R QuinnDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Matthew T JamesDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lorraine VenturatoFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kathryn M King-ShierFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with end-stage kidney disease can either pursue conservative (palliative) management or kidney replacement therapy. Although transplant is preferred, there is a limited number of organs available rendering the majority of patients treated with some form of dialysis. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are equivalent regarding clinical outcomes, but peritoneal dialysis is much less costly to provide. Peritoneal dialysis is most often done in the home by the patient or a support person and carries a self-care burden on patients and families. Social support is important for patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and in sustaining peritoneal dialysis therapy. Few studies have comprehensively explored social support in the context of peritoneal dialysis.

objectiveTo explore how patients, family members, and nurses view social support.

designQualitative, descriptive study.

settingAn outpatient peritoneal dialysis clinic in Western Canada.

participantsPatients, family members, and nurses.

methodsPatients (n

resultsThemes related to the 4 attributes of social support were identified: addressing emotional needs and managing emotion (emotional support); peritoneal dialysis tasks and life tasks (instrumental support); accessing information, receiving information, and learning (informational support); and affirmation/external reassurance and self-confidence (appraisal support). The social support needs of both patients and family members varied and were dependent on their existing support networks and individual perspectives of support. LIMITATIONS: It is possible that some of the study findings were gender-bound as well as context-specific. The study findings could be different if the patient and caregiver sample were more balanced based on sex. There are also unique attributes of each peritoneal dialysis program that may impact the transferability of these findings to other practice settings.

conclusionHome-based peritoneal dialysis has potential benefit to patients and health care systems. However, receiving peritoneal dialysis requires support. If health care providers wish to promote this treatment, they must also understand how to best support patients and their family members.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

end-stage kidney diseasefamily membershome dialysisnursespatientsperitoneal dialysisqualitative descriptivesocial support

Identifiers

PMID32843986
PMCPMC7418238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.