Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843957›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism2020

Current understanding of hypothalamic amenorrhoea.

Rachel E Roberts, Linda Farahani, Lisa Webber, Channa Jayasena

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Determinants and Assessment of Menstrual Blood Flow.Current epidemiology reports · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel E RobertsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
Linda FarahaniSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK, and Department of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Lisa WebberDepartment of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Channa JayasenaSection of Investigative Medicine, 6th Floor Commonwealth Building, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W120NN, UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBQueen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital · GBSt. Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2017-10-098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypothalamic amenorrhoea (HA) accounts for approximately 30% of cases of secondary amenorrhoea in women of reproductive age. It is caused by deficient secretion of hypothalamic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, which in turn leads to failure of pituitary gonadotrophin and gonadal steroid release. Functional HA (FHA) is defined as HA occurring in the absence of a structural lesion and is predominantly caused by significant weight loss, intense exercise or stress. Treatment of FHA is crucial in avoiding the long-term health consequences on fertility and bone health, in addition to reducing psychological morbidity. This article summarises our understanding of the mechanisms underlying FHA, the evidence base for its clinical management and emerging therapies.

Indexed as

amenorrhoeahypothalamusinfertilitykisspeptinoestrogen

Identifiers

PMID32843957
PMCPMC7418467
OpenAlexW3046745605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.