Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843875›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2020

Exploring interprofessional collaboration and attitudes of health sciences librarians.

Rachel J Hinrichs, Caitlin J Bakker, Tara J Brigham, Emily C Ginier, Gregg A Stevens, Kristine M Alpi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel J Hinrichsrhinrich@iupui.edu, Assistant Health Sciences Librarian, IUPUI University Library, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-744X
Caitlin J Bakkercjbakker@umn.edu, Research Services Librarian, Health Sciences Libraries, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-8382
Tara J Brighambrigham.tara@mayo.edu, Assistant Professor of Medical Education and Medical Librarian, Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-4819
Emily C Giniereginier@umich.edu, Informationist, Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-1619-8010
Gregg A Stevensgregg.stevens@stonybrook.edu, Health Sciences Librarian, Health Sciences Library, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-4088-6742
Kristine M Alpikrisalpi@gmail.com, University Librarian, OHSU Library, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-3523
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USJacksonville College · USOregon Health & Science University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assessed health sciences librarians' attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration using the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) and gathered information on their involvement with interprofessional activities.

methodsThe authors sent a survey to librarians in the Medical Library Association's (MLA's) Interprofessional Education Special Interest Group and Research Section consisting of the IEPS and questions about their prior and current experiences with interprofessional practice and education (IPE). We compared mean IEPS scores between each MLA group and several other demographic factors to assess differences in attitudes. We also compared librarians' IEPS scores with those of previously published health professional students' IEPS scores and thematically analyzed two open-ended questions.

resultsHealth sciences librarians' scores on the IEPS indicated positive attitudes toward IPE. There were no statistically significant differences between any group. Health sciences librarians' mean IEPS score was similar to the mean score of health professions students from a prior study. The most commonly reported interprofessional activity was teaching or facilitating learning activities for health professions students; fewer served on committees or engaged in non-curricular activities such as grand rounds and book clubs.

conclusionHealth sciences librarians in this study reported positive attitudes toward IPE, in line with the majority of other previously studied health professionals. Years of experience, previous health professional careers, and experience supporting IPE as a librarian had little bearing on the responses to the survey. This suggests that health sciences librarians have positive attitudes toward IPE, regardless of whether they directly support IPE programs or participate in interprofessional activities.

Indexed as

AttitudeInterprofessional RelationsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLibrariansLibraries, MedicalPilot ProjectsStudents, Health OccupationsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32843875
PMCPMC7441895
OpenAlexW3040406484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.