Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843790›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

Comparison of Duration of Analgesic Comparison of Duration of Analgesic Effect of Nalbuphine and Morphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in the Supraclavicular Block under Ultrasound Guidance.

Aruna Vengadessane, Jayashri Devi Rajaraman, M S Raghuraman, R Krishna Prabu, Srilekha Damodaran, Britto Sabu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aruna VengadessaneDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Jayashri Devi RajaramanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
M S RaghuramanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
R Krishna PrabuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Srilekha DamodaranDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Britto SabuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Puducherry, India.
Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many studies are available in the literature that has analyzed the effects of morphine, nalbuphine, and other opioids, no study had compared the effects of nalbuphine versus morphine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the supraclavicular block under the guidance of ultrasound. METHODOLOGY: A randomized, double-blinded, prospective study was carried out on 60 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II who were undergoing upper limb surgeries under the supraclavicular block. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (

resultsIn Group N, there was a statistically significant reduction in the time of onset of sensory block (9.9 ± 3.0 vs. 12.2 ± 2.6 min,

conclusionNalbuphine when added to bupivacaine as an adjuvant had significantly shortened the time of onset of sensory and motor blockade than morphine. However, the duration of analgesia, sensory and motor blockade of nalbuphine versus morphine were comparable.

Indexed as

Brachial plexus blockmorphinenalbuphinesupraclavicular block

Identifiers

PMID32843790
PMCPMC7428107
OpenAlexW3036534850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.