ArticleScientific reports2020
Experimental investigation of the dynamic cavitation behavior and wall static pressure characteristics through convergence-divergence venturis with various divergence angles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization and evaluation of venturi tube reactors for non-thermal milk pasteurization using CFD method.PloS one · 2026Article
- Experimental study of cavitating flow around a NACA 0012 hydrofoil in a slit channel.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a highly efficient and energy-saving cavitation method, Venturi cavitation is widely used in many industrial fields. This study synchronously investigated the cavity behavior and its corresponding wall static pressure characteristics in Venturi channels with various divergence angles to research the role of the divergence angle in cavity shape and the wall static pressure oscillation. Five rectangular Venturi channels with different divergence angles (4°, 6°, 8°, 10°, and 12°) were tested at the cavitation number (0.3-1.0). Based on the dynamic behaviour of gas-liquid interface, three cavity shedding types were identified: front shedding (I), central shedding (II) and tail shedding (III). A modified correlation for predicting average cavity length was proposed with the consideration of the effect of the divergence angle. Combined with the wall static pressure characteristics, as the divergence angle increased, the wall static pressure fluctuation in the Venturi became more intense. According to the wall static pressure oscillation characteristics, for the larger divergence angles (θ = 6°, 8°, 10° and 12°), the wall static pressure oscillation frequency was the same as the cavity shedding frequency and increased with the increase of the divergence angle. For smaller divergence angle (θ = 4°), no definite periodicity in pressure oscillation frequency could be observed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.