Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843519›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Decisions to use antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections across China: a large-scale cross-sectional survey among university students.

Leesa Lin, Elizabeth Fearon, Stephan Harbarth, Xiaomin Wang, Chunling Lu, Xudong Zhou, James R Hargreaves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Leesa LinPublic Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4123-4762
Elizabeth FearonPublic Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stephan HarbarthInfection Prevention and Control Division, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneve, Switzerland.
Xiaomin WangSchool of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chunling LuDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xudong ZhouSchool of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China zhouxudong@zju.edu.cn.
James R HargreavesPublic Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Harvard University · USIndiana University School of MedicineSociety for Public Health Education · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the decision-making process of Chinese university students with respect to antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).

designA cross-sectional questionnaire study.

settingThe participants recruited from six universities across all Chinese regions from September to November 2015.

participantsA total of 2834 university students sampled across six Chinese regions who self-reported experiencing symptoms of URTI within the past month completed the survey. OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of decisions for treatment and antibiotic use for URTIs as well as knowledge about antibiotic use were measured by a self-administrated questionnaire. Using regular and multinomial logistic regression a nd adapted health belief model, we identified and measured a number of variables as potential risk factors for antibiotic misuse behaviours in order to explain and predict people's treatment decisions and antibiotic use including knowledge, perceptions, access to antibiotics and cues to action.

resultsOf the 2834 university students who self-diagnosed a URTI, 947 (33.4%) self-reported having taken antibiotics; among them, 462 (48.8%) used non-prescription antibiotics, which came principally from left-over prescriptions (29.0%) and over-the-counter purchases at retail pharmacies (67.3%). One in four who sought care pressured their doctors for antibiotics; all received them. Those who perceived greater severity of the disease, had access to antibiotics, perceived benefits of using antibiotics (for the common cold: adjusted OR (aOR)=2.55, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.38 or as anti-inflammatory drugs: aOR=1.35, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.63), and were cued to action (eg, seeing presence of fever: aOR=2.05, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.60 or self-diagnosing their current infection as severe: aOR=1.86, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.45), keeping antibiotics at home (aOR=2.27, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.81) and access to over-the-counter antibiotics (aOR=2.00, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.45), were more likely to misuse antibiotics.

conclusionsMisconceptions of antibiotic efficacy and easy access to antibiotics-with or without a prescription-were associated with antibiotic misuse among Chinese university students, which calls for context-appropriate multifaceted interventions in order to effectively reduce antibiotic misuse.

Indexed as

Respiratory Tract InfectionsUniversitiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agentsinfectious diseasesprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID32843519
PMCPMC7449317
OpenAlexW3080252199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.