Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843342›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Finding the neural correlates of collaboration using a three-person fMRI hyperscanning paradigm.

Hua Xie, Iliana I Karipidis, Amber Howell, Meredith Schreier, Kristen E Sheau, Mai K Manchanda, Rafi Ayub, Gary H Glover, Malte Jung, Allan L Reiss and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantum-inspired entanglement between collaborating brains during human memory encoding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Active-Inference Approach to Second-Person Neuroscience.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hyperscanning: from inter-brain coupling to causality.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hua XieDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-0147
Iliana I KaripidisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-0309
Amber HowellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Meredith SchreierDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Kristen E SheauDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Mai K ManchandaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Rafi AyubDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Gary H GloverDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Malte JungDepartment of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Allan L ReissDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Manish SaggarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304; saggar@stanford.edu.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015891 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GLOVER, GARY H · 2012 to 2019
$10.7M
Quantifying the Fluctuations of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Healthy and Patient PopulationsR00MH104605 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2017 to 2019
$747k
Quantifying the Fluctuations of Intrinsic Brain Activity in Healthy and Patient PopulationsK99MH104605 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2015 to 2016
$244k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015891NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH104605NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have an extraordinary ability to interact and cooperate with others. Despite the social and evolutionary significance of collaboration, research on finding its neural correlates has been limited partly due to restrictions on the simultaneous neuroimaging of more than one participant (also known as hyperscanning). Several studies have used dyadic fMRI hyperscanning to examine the interaction between two participants. However, to our knowledge, no study to date has aimed at revealing the neural correlates of social interactions using a three-person (or triadic) fMRI hyperscanning paradigm. Here, we simultaneously measured the blood-oxygenation level-dependent signal from 12 triads (

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingCognitionFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsIntersectoral CollaborationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingNeuronsSocial BehaviorTheory of Mindcollaborative drawingintersubject brain synchronizationright temporo‐parietal junctiontheory-of-mind networkthree-person hyperscanning

Identifiers

PMID32843342
PMCPMC7502732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.