Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843231›Full record

ArticleJournal of autoimmunity2020

High dose subcutaneous Anakinra to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to cytokine storm syndrome among severely ill COVID-19 patients.

Enrique Iglesias-Julián, María López-Veloso, Noelia de-la-Torre-Ferrera, Julio Cesar Barraza-Vengoechea, Pedro David Delgado-López, María Colazo-Burlato, Marta Ubeira-Iglesias, Miguel Montero-Baladía, Andrés Lorenzo-Martín, Javier Minguito-de-la-Iglesia and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autoimmunity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Current evidence on the use of anakinra in COVID-19.International immunopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  15. Anti-cytokine Therapy in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: The Jury is Out.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Biologics in COVID-19 So Far: Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Patients with COVID-19: in the dark-NETs of neutrophils.Cell death and differentiation · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrique Iglesias-JuliánSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain. Electronic address: eiglesiasjulian@gmail.com.
María López-VelosoSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Noelia de-la-Torre-FerreraSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Julio Cesar Barraza-VengoecheaSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Pedro David Delgado-LópezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
María Colazo-BurlatoDepartment of Rheumatology, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Marta Ubeira-IglesiasDepartment of Pharmacy, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Miguel Montero-BaladíaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Andrés Lorenzo-MartínDepartment of Rheumatology, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Javier Minguito-de-la-IglesiaDepartment of Pneumology, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Juan Pablo García-MuñozDepartment of Pneumology, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Rodrigo Sanllorente-SebastiánDepartment of Anesthesiology, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Blanca Vicente-GonzálezDepartment of Pharmacy, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Ana Alemán-AlemánDepartment of Internal Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Luis Buzón-MartínInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Burgos University Hospital, Spain.
Universidad de Burgos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSeverely ill COVID-19 patients may end in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ failure. Some of them develop a systemic hyperinflammatory state produced by the massive release of inflammatory agents, known as cytokine storm syndrome (CSS). Inhibition of IL-1 by Anakinra (ANK) is a potential life-saving therapy for severe CSS cases. We propose a rationale for the use of subcutaneous ANK and review our initial experience in a small cohort of severe COVID-19 CSS patients.

methodsRetrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients developing ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 <300) and exhibiting signs of hyperinflammation (ferritin >1000 ng/mL and/or d-dimers > 1.5 μg/mL, plus IL-6 < 40 mg/mL) that received ANK. For comparison, a propensity score matched historical cohort of patients treated with IL-6 inhibitor Tocilizumab (TCZ) was used. Patients had previously received combinations of azithromycin, hydroxy-chloroquine, and methyl-prednisolone. Laboratory findings, respiratory function and adverse effects were monitored. Resolution of ARDS within the first 7 days of treatment was considered a favorable outcome.

resultsSubcutaneous ANK (100 mg every 6 h) was given to 9 COVID-19 ARDS CSS patients (77.8% males). Median age was 62 years (range, 42 to 87). A TCZ cohort of 18 patients was selected by propensity score matching and treated with intravenous single dose of 600 mg for patients weighing >75 Kg, or 400 mg if < 75 Kg. Prior to treatment, median PaO2/FiO2 ratio of the ANK and TCZ cohorts were 193 and 249, respectively (p = 0.131). After 7 days of treatment, PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved in both groups to 279 (104-335) and 331 (140-476, p = 0.099) respectively. On day 7, there was significant reduction of ferritin (p = 0.046), CRP (p = 0.043), and IL-6 (p = 0.043) levels in the ANK cohort but only of CRP (p = 0.001) in the TCZ group. Favorable outcome was achieved in 55.6% and 88.9% of the ANK and TCZ cohorts, respectively (p = 0.281). Two patients that failed to respond to TCZ improved after ANK treatment. Aminotransferase levels significantly increased between day 1 and day 7 (p = 0.004) in the TCZ group. Mortality was the same in both groups (11%). There were not any opportunistic infection in the groups nor other adverse effects attributable to treatment.

conclusionOverall, 55.6% of COVID-19 ARDS CSS patients treated with ANK exhibited favorable outcome, not inferior to a TCZ treated matched cohort. ANK may be a potential alternative to TCZ for patients with elevated aminotransferases, and may be useful in non-responders to TCZ.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsCohort StudiesCytokine Release SyndromeDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousInterleukin-1Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinInterleukin-6 InhibitorsMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsInterleukin-1Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinInterleukin-6 InhibitorstocilizumabAcute respiratory distress syndromeAnakinraCOVID-19Cytokine storm syndromeIL-1SARS-CoV2Tocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID32843231
PMCPMC7439828
OpenAlexW3060557737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.