Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843212›Full record

Observational studySurgery2020

The continuum of complications in survivors of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Thomas K Maatman, Alexandra M Roch, Eugene P Ceppa, Jeffrey J Easler, Mark A Gromski, Michael G House, Attila Nakeeb, C Max Schmidt, Stuart Sherman, Nicholas J Zyromski

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas K MaatmanDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Alexandra M RochDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Eugene P CeppaDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Jeffrey J EaslerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Mark A GromskiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Michael G HouseDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Attila NakeebDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
C Max SchmidtDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Stuart ShermanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Nicholas J ZyromskiDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: nzyromsk@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Indiana University clinical Center for acute pancreatitis and diabetes clinical research networkU01DK127382 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Carmella Evans-Molina, Evan L Fogel · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNecrotizing pancreatitis survivors develop complications beyond infected necrosis that often require invasive intervention. Remarkably few data have cataloged these late complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis resolution. We sought to identify the types and incidence of complications after necrotizing pancreatitis.

designAn observational study was performed evaluating 647 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis captured in a single-institution database between 2005 and 2017 at a tertiary care hospital. Retrospective review and analysis of newly diagnosed conditions attributable to necrotizing pancreatitis was performed. Exclusion criteria included the following: death before disease resolution (n = 57, 9%) and patients lost to follow-up (n = 12, 2%).

resultsA total of 578 patients were followed for a median of 46 months (range, 8 months to 15 y) after necrotizing pancreatitis. In 489 (85%) patients 1 or more complications developed and included symptomatic disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (285 of 578, 49%), splanchnic vein thrombosis (257 of 572, 45%), new endocrine insufficiency (195 of 549, 35%), new exocrine insufficiency (108 of 571, 19%), symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (93 of 571, 16%), incisional hernia (89 of 420, 21%), biliary stricture (90 of 576, 16%), chronic pain (44 of 575, 8%), gastrointestinal fistula (44 of 578, 8%), pancreatic duct stricture (30 of 578, 5%), and duodenal stricture (28 of 578, 5%). During the follow-up period, a total of 340 (59%) patients required an invasive intervention after necrotizing pancreatitis resolution. Invasive pancreatobiliary intervention was required in 230 (40%) patients.

conclusionLate complications are common in necrotizing pancreatitis survivors. A broad variety of problems manifest themselves after resolution of the acute disease process and often require invasive intervention. Necrotizing pancreatitis patients should be followed lifelong by experienced clinicians.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainConstriction, PathologicDrainageExocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric FistulaHumansIncidenceIntestinal FistulaIslets of LangerhansMale

Identifiers

PMID32843212
PMCPMC8122589
OpenAlexW3080653885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.