Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843105›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2020

Willpower with and without effort.

George Ainslie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural basis of self-control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Corporate Weakness of Will.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2025
    Article
  3. Phenylketonuria as an Adherence Disease.Patient preference and adherence · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Running away from the marshmallow: the relevance of behaviour settings for a situated science of self-control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Willpower Paradox: Possible and Impossible Conceptions of Self-Control.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Behavioral construction of the future.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Impact of Personal Experience of COVID-19 Disease on Recreational Anglers' Attitudes and Behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George AinslieDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Coatesville, PA19320; and School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7710, South Africa. George.Ainslie@va.gov; http://www.picoeconomics.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9201-9144

Funding

Intramural VA VA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most authors who discuss willpower assume that everyone knows what it is, but our assumptions differ to such an extent that we talk past each other. We agree that willpower is the psychological function that resists temptations - variously known as impulses, addictions, or bad habits; that it operates simultaneously with temptations, without prior commitment; and that use of it is limited by its cost, commonly called effort, as well as by the person's skill at executive functioning. However, accounts are usually not clear about how motivation functions during the application of willpower, or how motivation is related to effort. Some accounts depict willpower as the perceiving or formation of motivational contingencies that outweigh the temptation, and some depict it as a continuous use of mechanisms that interfere with re-weighing the temptation. Some others now suggest that impulse control can bypass motivation altogether, although they refer to this route as habit rather than willpower.It is argued here that willpower should be recognized as either or both of two distinct functions, which can be called resolve and suppression. Resolve is based on interpretation of a current choice as a test case for a broader set of future choices, which puts at stake more than the outcome of the current choice. Suppression is inhibiting valuation of (modulating) and/or keeping attention from (filtering) immediate alternatives to a current intention. Perception of current choices as test cases for broader outcomes may result in reliable preference for these outcomes, which is experienced as an effortless habit - a successful result of resolve, not an alternative method of self-control. Some possible brain imaging correlates are reviewed.

Indexed as

MotivationSelf-ControlBehavior, AddictiveBrainExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleAddictiondual valuationfrontocortical imaginghabitimpulsivenessinhibitionintertemporal bargainingresolverewardself-controlsuppression

Identifiers

PMID32843105
PMCPMC9280284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.