Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843024›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2020

Impact of lactoferrin on bone regenerative processes and its possible implementation in oral surgery - a systematic review of novel studies with metanalysis and metaregression.

Grzegorz Trybek, Maciej Jedliński, Aleksandra Jaroń, Olga Preuss, Marta Mazur, Anna Grzywacz

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Grzegorz TrybekDepartment of Oral Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72/18, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland.
Maciej JedlińskiDepartment of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Aleksandra JarońDepartment of Oral Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72/18, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland. jaronola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-6388
Olga PreussDepartment of Oral Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72/18, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland.
Marta MazurDepartment of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Anna GrzywaczIndependent Laboratory of Health Promotion, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, ul. Gen. Dezyderego Chłapowskiego 11, 70-103, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactoferrin is an iron - binding glycoprotein with anti-inflammatory and anabolic properties found in many internal fluids. It is worth looking at novel studies, because of their methodology and observations that may once be applicable in modern implantology. The aim of the study is to answer the question if lactoferrin is a promising factor for bone regenerative process in oral surgery.

methodAn electronic search was conducted on 14th October 2019 on the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. The keywords used in the search strategy were: lactoferrin AND bone regeneration AND oral surgery. The qualitative evaluation was conducted using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form. Then a metanalysis of a new bone growth and percentage of the resorbed graft were performed with the metaregression of lactoferrin dose to its outcome effects on bone regeneration.

resultsThe search strategy identified potential articles: 133 from PubMed, 2 from Scopus, 4 from Web of science. After removal of duplicates, 136 articles were analyzed. Subsequently, 131 papers were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining 5 papers were included in the qualitative synthesis. The use of lactoferrin clearly increases the growth of a newly formed bone (2.58, CI:[0.79, 4.37]), as well as shortens the time of the graft resorption (- 1.70, Cl:[3.43, 0.03]) and replaces it with a species-specific bone. Heterogeneity is significant at p < 0.001 level. Metaregression indicates that one unit increase in the log (Treatment dose), i.e. a 2.78 times increase of the Treatment dose, results in an increase of the Effect size by 0.682.

conclusionsThe use of lactoferrin both systemically and locally promotes anabolic processes (new bone formation). There is a relationship between the increase in administered dose of lactoferrin and the intensity of new bone formation. However, it is not only necessary to continue experimental research, but also to extend it to the clinical studies on patients, due to the limitations of different animal model research and different methodology, to introduce lactoferrin as a standard procedure for the treatment of bone defects, because it is a promising product.

Indexed as

LactoferrinOral Surgical ProceduresAnimalsBone RegenerationHumansLactoferrinAnimal studyBone regenerationBone remodelingDental implantsLactoferrinOral surgery

Identifiers

PMID32843024
PMCPMC7448436
OpenAlexW3080850320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.