Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32843005›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients' satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention.

Diego Montano, Marco Kuchenbaur, Heinrich Geissler, Richard Peter

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diego MontanoDepartment of Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstr. 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany. diego.montano@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4422-2724
Marco KuchenbaurDepartment of Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstr. 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany.
Heinrich GeisslerArbeit und Zukunft e.V, Hamburg, Germany.
Richard PeterDepartment of Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Parkstr. 11, 89073, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

German Federal Innovation Fund 01VSF18006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the present investigation the study protocol and the results at baseline of a workplace intervention are reported. It is hypothesised that the reduction of the physical and psychosocial workload of healthcare workers increases 1 their self-assessed physical and mental work ability, and 2. clients' satisfaction with care.

methodsTwo-arm, cluster-randomised trial. Outcome data on workers and clients are collected in questionnaires at baseline, and two follow-ups between 2019 and 2021. Participants of the interventions are healthcare workers of 11 healthcare providers in Germany. At baseline, the intervention arm comprised 22 clusters (n = 174 workers); the control arm, 47 clusters (n = 276). The intervention consists of interviews and workshops, in which employees propose measures aiming to reduce the physical and psychosocial load, and strengthen resources at work. The primary outcome is the workers' physical and mental work ability. The secondary outcome is the clients' satisfaction with care.

resultsThere was no evidence of substantial differences between trial arms at baseline concerning the outcomes. The design effect estimates for physical and mental work ability were 1.29 and 1.05, respectively. At the end of the trial, effect sizes of at least 0.30 and 0.27 at the 80% power and 5% significance levels can be attained.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the implementation of the study design has been satisfactory. The intervention is expected to provide evidence of relatively small to medium-size effects of the intervention activities on the work ability of healthcare workers and the clients' satisfaction with care.

trial registrationRegistration trial DRKS00021138 on the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS), retrospectively registered on 25 March, 2020.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadWorkplaceYoung AdultEffort-reward imbalanceOrganisational interventionsPsychosocial loadWork abilityWork stress

Identifiers

PMID32843005
PMCPMC7449031
OpenAlexW3081506577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.