Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32842965›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2020

The influence of care home managers on the implementation of a complex intervention: findings from the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of dementia care mapping.

R Kelley, A W Griffiths, E Shoesmith, J McDermid, E Couch, O Robinson, D Perfect, C A Surr

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R KelleyCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK. r.kelley@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-0313
A W GriffithsCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
E ShoesmithCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
J McDermidInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
E CouchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
O RobinsonCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
D PerfectOxfordshire NHS Trust, Oxfordshire, UK.
C A SurrCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
Leeds Beckett University · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/15/13Health Technology Assessment Programme 11/15/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people with dementia live in care homes, where staff can struggle to meet their complex needs. Successful practice improvement interventions in these settings require strong managerial support, but little is known about how managers can support implementation in practice, or what factors support or hinder care home managers in providing this support. Using Dementia Care Mapping™ (DCM) as an example, this study explored how care home managers can support the implementation of complex interventions, and identified factors affecting their ability to provide this support.

methodsWe undertook interviews with 48 staff members (managers and intervention leads) from care homes participating in the intervention arm of the DCM EPIC trial of DCM implementation.

resultsManagerial support played a key role in facilitating the implementation of a complex intervention in care home settings. Managers could provide practical and financial support in many forms. However, managerial support and leadership approaches towards implementation were highly variable in practice, and implementation was easily de-stabilised by management changes or competing managerial priorities. How well managers understood, valued and engaged with the intervention, alongside the leadership style they adopted to support implementation, were key influences on implementation success.

conclusionsFor care home managers to effectively support interventions they must fully understand the proposed intervention and its potential value. This is especially important during times of managerial or practice changes, when managers lack the skills required to effectively support implementation, or when the intervention is complex. It may be unfeasible to successfully implement new interventions during times of managerial or practice instability.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN82288852 , registered 16/01/2014.

Indexed as

DementiaHumansLeadershipPatient-Centered CareCare homesComplex interventionsDementia care mappingPerson-centred careProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID32842965
PMCPMC7446218
OpenAlexW3080198764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.