Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32842624›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Effect of Prickly Pear Cactus Peel Supplementation on Milk Production, Nutrient Digestibility and Rumen Fermentation of Sheep and the Maternal Effects on Growth and Physiological Performance of Suckling Offspring.

Sabrin A Morshedy, Aymen E Abdal Mohsen, Mohamed M Basyony, Rafa Almeer, Mohamed M Abdel-Daim, Yassmine M El-Gindy

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effect of Using Prickly Pear Seed Cake (Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Cactus species and tree forage hay in the diet of dairy goats.Tropical animal health and production · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabrin A MorshedyFish and Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, P.O. Box 21531, Alexandria 21500, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9389-9259
Aymen E Abdal MohsenAnimal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Doki 12622, Egypt.
Mohamed M BasyonyAnimal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Doki 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0343-2912
Rafa AlmeerDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed M Abdel-DaimDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-2713
Yassmine M El-GindyFish and Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, P.O. Box 21531, Alexandria 21500, Egypt.

Funding

King Saud University RSP-2020/96
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prickly pear cactus peels (

Indexed as

Barki ewesmaternal effectnutrient digestibilityphysiological statusprickly pear cactus peelsrumen fermentation

Identifiers

PMID32842624
PMCPMC7552258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.