ArticleGenes2020
PreLnc: An Accurate Tool for Predicting lncRNAs Based on Multiple Features.
Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- LncRNAs in neuropsychiatric disorders and computational insights for their prediction.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- A large-scale benchmark study of tools for the classification of protein-coding and non-coding RNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- TACOS: a novel approach for accurate prediction of cell-specific long noncoding RNAs subcellular localization.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have certain similarities with messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and are associated with numerous important biological processes, thereby demanding methods to distinguish them. Based on machine learning algorithms, a variety of methods are developed to identify lncRNAs, providing significant basic data support for subsequent studies. However, many tools lack certain scalability, versatility and balance, and some tools rely on genome sequence and annotation. In this paper, we propose a convenient and accurate tool "PreLnc", which uses high-confidence lncRNA and mRNA transcripts to build prediction models through feature selection and classifiers. The false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted P-value and Z-value were used for analyzing the tri-nucleotide composition of transcripts of different species. Conclusions can be drawn from the experiment that there were significant differences in RNA transcripts among plants, which may be related to evolutionary conservation and the fact that plants are under evolutionary pressure for a longer time than animals. Combining with the Pearson correlation coefficient, we use the incremental feature selection (IFS) method and the comparison of multiple classifiers to build the model. Finally, the balanced random forest was used to construct the classifier, and PreLnc obtained 91.09% accuracy for 349,186 transcripts of animals and plants. In addition, by comparing standard performance measurements, PreLnc performed better than other prediction tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.