Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32842460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Case Study in a Working Environment Highlighting the Divergence between Noise Intensity and Workers' Perception towards Noise.

Chun-Yip Hon, Illia Tchernikov, Craig Fairclough, Alberto Behar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chun-Yip HonSchool of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8893-710X
Illia TchernikovWorkplace Safety and Prevention Services, Mississauga, ON L4W 0A1, Canada,.
Craig FaircloughWorkplace Safety and Prevention Services, Mississauga, ON L4W 0A1, Canada,.
Alberto BeharSMART Lab., Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-3594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive noise levels are a prevalent issue in food processing operations and, although there have been numerous studies on occupational noise, no single study has used a concurrent mixed-methods approach. Employing this study design allows for an understanding of the level of convergence (similarity) between measured noise levels and workers' attitudes and perceptions towards noise. This, in turn, allows for the identification of potential challenges with respect to the implementation of hearing conservation efforts. In this study, spot noise measurements were collected using a sound level meter. One-on-one interviews were conducted with workers to determine attitudes and perceptions towards noise in their workplaces. Subsequently, the results of the noise measurements (quantitative data) were integrated with the survey responses (qualitative data) to identify convergence. The majority of the noise measurements were found to exceed 85 dBA-the criterion mandated by the local occupational health and safety legislation. Although all study participants felt that it was noisy in the workplace, a large proportion of respondents indicated that the noise was not bothersome. With workers' perception being contradictory to the measured noise levels, it is a challenge to implement hearing conservation measures unless changes are made to raise the awareness of the risks associated with excessive noise exposure.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWorkplaceAdultAgedCanadaFemaleHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePerceptionRisk Assessmentattitudes and perceptionshearing conservation programmeat processingmixed-methodsoccupational noise

Identifiers

PMID32842460
PMCPMC7504514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.