Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32842459›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Gait Activity Classification on Unbalanced Data from Inertial Sensors Using Shallow and Deep Learning.

Irvin Hussein Lopez-Nava, Luis M Valentín-Coronado, Matias Garcia-Constantino, Jesus Favela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discriminating Between Marijuana and Alcohol Gait Impairments Using Tile CNN With TICA Pooling.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irvin Hussein Lopez-NavaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ciudad de México 03940, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-9465
Luis M Valentín-CoronadoConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ciudad de México 03940, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9874-4088
Matias Garcia-ConstantinoSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3420-0532
Jesus FavelaDepartment of Computer Science, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Investigación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada 22860, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2967-9654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activity recognition is one of the most active areas of research in ubiquitous computing. In particular, gait activity recognition is useful to identify various risk factors in people's health that are directly related to their physical activity. One of the issues in activity recognition, and gait in particular, is that often datasets are unbalanced (i.e., the distribution of classes is not uniform), and due to this disparity, the models tend to categorize into the class with more instances. In the present study, two methods for classifying gait activities using accelerometer and gyroscope data from a large-scale public dataset were evaluated and compared. The gait activities in this dataset are: (i) going down an incline, (ii) going up an incline, (iii) walking on level ground, (iv) going down stairs, and (v) going up stairs. The proposed methods are based on conventional (shallow) and deep learning techniques. In addition, data were evaluated from three data treatments: original unbalanced data, sampled data, and augmented data. The latter was based on the generation of synthetic data according to segmented gait data. The best results were obtained with classifiers built with augmented data, with F-measure results of 0.812 (σ = 0.078) for the shallow learning approach, and of 0.927 (σ = 0.033) for the deep learning approach. In addition, the data augmentation strategy proposed to deal with the unbalanced problem resulted in increased classification performance using both techniques.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGait AnalysisHumansStair ClimbingWalkingactivity recognitiongait activitiesgait classificationhuman gaitinertial sensors

Identifiers

PMID32842459
PMCPMC7506657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.