Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32841541›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2020

Phase II trial of sorafenib and doxorubicin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after disease progression on sorafenib.

Imane El Dika, Marinela Capanu, Joanne F Chou, James J Harding, Michele Ly, Anna D Hrabovsky, Richard K G Do, Jinru Shia, Brittanie Millang, Jennifer Ma and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Small-molecule-based targeted therapy in liver cancer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imane El DikaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marinela CapanuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joanne F ChouMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
James J HardingMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7029-4310
Michele LyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anna D HrabovskyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Richard K G DoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jinru ShiaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Brittanie MillangMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer MaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eileen M O'ReillyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-9199
Ghassan K Abou-AlfaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-8054
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received second line sorafenib plus doxorubicin following disease progression on sorafenib were shown retrospectively to have improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sorafenib plus doxorubicin combination may synergistically promote ASK-1 mediated apoptosis in cancer cells through RAF-1 inhibition. Thus, we conducted this phase II study of sorafenib and doxorubicin combination following progression on sorafenib.

methodsPatients with histologically confirmed advanced HCC, confirmed radiologic progression on sorafenib, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70%, and Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis were eligible. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and doxorubicin 60 mg/m

resultsThirty patients were enrolled in the study, 86% were male, median age was 64 years. OS6 was 76.6% (95%CI: 57.2%-88.1%). Median OS was 8.6 (95%CI: 7.3-12) months, and median PFS reached 3.9 (95%CI: 2.4-4.6) months. Three (11%) partial responses were observed and 17 patients (61%) had stable disease. Pertinent grade 3-4 adverse events that occurred in more than 10% of patients included neutropenia (16%), febrile neutropenia (10%), anemia (10%), thrombocytopenia (10%), elevated AST (23%) and ALT (10%), hypophosphatemia (10%), and fatigue (10%). No association with the difference in baseline and post-treatment ASK-1 and pERK level of expression by IHC and survival outcomes was detected.

conclusionSorafenib plus doxorubicin following progression on sorafenib did not show any improved outcome. We do not recommend further development or use of this combination in HCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionDoxorubicinFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorDoxorubicinSorafenibASK-1doxorubicinHCChepatocellular carcinomapERKsecond linesorafenib

Identifiers

PMID32841541
PMCPMC7571806
OpenAlexW3081388035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.