ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
The evaluation of low cut-off index values of Elecsys
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV testing algorithm using fourth generation reagents reduces the false positive rate of screening tests.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Data on the Relationships of Signal-To-Cutoff Ratios of Elecsys HIV Antigen/Antibody and Elecsys Syphilis Assays to Subsequent Confirmatory Testing at an Academic Medical Center.Data in brief · 2021Article
- The evaluation of low cut-off index values of ElecsysJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the results of different cut-off index (COI) values of Elecsys
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of samples analyzed by Elecsys
resultsA total of 379 122 samples were analyzed. 2528 (0.67%) were positive by Elecsys
conclusionSamples with low COI values, especially those contain confounding factors, need to be further scrutinized to determine whether the confounding factors may cause false-positive problem. In addition, the hypothesis that low COI values may predict false-positive results is valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.