ArticleBlood advances2020
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel agents.
Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-risk single-refractory and double-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: feasibility and impact of alloHCT.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Acalabrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Pharmacology and Emerging Clinical Perspectives.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- HSCT and CAR-T: a power couple-but who serves whom?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Management of Relapsed and/or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Review
- Outcomes of allogeneic haemopoietic transplant for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the modern era.Internal medicine journal · 2025Article
- Resistance mechanisms and approach to chronic lymphocytic leukemia after BTK inhibitor therapy.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2025Review
- Beyond BCL2 (B cell lymphoma) and BTK (Bruton tyrosine kinase) inhibitors: novel agents and resistance mechanisms for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Characteristics and outcomes of patients with double refractory and double exposed chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Consensus recommendations from the 2024 Lymphoma Research Foundation workshop on treatment selection and sequencing in CLL or SLL.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Cell Therapy as a Way to Increase the Effectiveness of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Cells · 2024Review
- Tracking Rare Single Donor and Recipient Immune and Leukemia Cells after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Mitochondrial DNA Mutations.Blood cancer discovery · 2024Article
- The Economic Impact of Treatment Sequencing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Canada Using Venetoclax plus Obinutuzumab.Cancers · 2024Article
- Treatment Sequencing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in 2024: Where We Are and Where We Are Headed.Cancers · 2024Review
- Treatment of Double-Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia-An Unmet Clinical Need.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- CAR-T Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing-Optimal Sequencing of Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Treatment Refractoriness in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Old and New Molecular Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The European landscape on allogeneic haematopoeietic cell transplantation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia between 2009 and 2019: a perspective from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although novel agents (NAs) have improved outcomes for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a subset will progress through all available NAs. Understanding outcomes for potentially curative modalities including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) following NA therapy is critical while devising treatment sequences aimed at long-term disease control. In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we examined 65 patients with CLL who underwent alloHCT following exposure to ≥1 NA, including baseline disease and transplant characteristics, treatment preceding alloHCT, transplant outcomes, treatment following alloHCT, and survival outcomes. Univariable and multivariable analyses evaluated associations between pre-alloHCT factors and progression-free survival (PFS). Twenty-four-month PFS, overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality, and relapse incidence were 63%, 81%, 13%, and 27% among patients transplanted for CLL. Day +100 cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 24%; moderate-severe GVHD developed in 27%. Poor-risk disease characteristics, prior NA exposure, complete vs partial remission, and transplant characteristics were not independently associated with PFS. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index independently predicts PFS. PFS and OS were not impacted by having received NAs vs both NAs and chemoimmunotherapy, 1 vs ≥2 NAs, or ibrutinib vs venetoclax as the line of therapy immediately pre-alloHCT. AlloHCT remains a viable long-term disease control strategy that overcomes adverse CLL characteristics. Prior NAs do not appear to impact the safety of alloHCT, and survival outcomes are similar regardless of number of NAs received, prior chemoimmunotherapy exposure, or NA immediately preceding alloHCT. Decisions about proceeding to alloHCT should consider comorbidities and anticipated response to remaining therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.