ArticlePLoS genetics2020
Functional information from clinically-derived drug resistant forms of the Candida glabrata Pdr1 transcription factor.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Candida glabrata YPK2 is a multidrug susceptibility locus.Genetics · 2026Article
- Slt2 kinase of the cell wall integrity pathway is required for Fks2-specific echinocandin resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
- RTA-like proteins regulate azole susceptibility by affecting the expression of the oxidoreductase gene oxrA in Aspergillus fumigatus.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Targeting the deSUMOylase Ulp2 in Candida glabrata for antifungal therapies: in silico identification of silymarin and honokiol as potential inhibitors.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Mechanism of azole resistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Role and mechanism of hexyl-aminolevulinate ethosome-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in reversing fluconazole resistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- FungAMR: a comprehensive database for investigating fungal mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance.Nature microbiology · 2025Article
- Tn-seq screens inmSphere · 2025Article
- Genetic interaction analysis ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Similarities and distinctions in the activation of themSphere · 2024Article
- Article
- Similarities and distinctions in the activation of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Overlapping coactivator function is required for transcriptional activation by the Candida glabrata Pdr1 transcription factor.Genetics · 2024Article
- Exploring the stress response mechanisms to 2-phenylethanol conferred by Pdr1p mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Article
- Population genomic analyses reveal high diversity, recombination and nosocomial transmission amongMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- The Microevolution of Antifungal Drug Resistance in Pathogenic Fungi.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- CWHM-974 is a fluphenazine derivative with improved antifungal activity againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023Article
- Genotypic diversity and unrecognized antifungal resistance among populations of Candida glabrata from positive blood cultures.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Azole drugs are the most frequently used antifungal agents. The pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata acquires resistance to azole drugs via single amino acid substitution mutations eliciting a gain-of-function (GOF) hyperactive phenotype in the Pdr1 transcription factor. These GOF mutants constitutively drive high transcription of target genes such as the ATP-binding cassette transporter-encoding CDR1 locus. Previous characterization of Pdr1 has demonstrated that this factor is negatively controlled by the action of a central regulatory domain (CRD) of ~700 amino acids, in which GOF mutations are often found. Our earlier experiments demonstrated that a Pdr1 derivative in which the CRD was deleted gave rise to a transcriptional regulator that could not be maintained as the sole copy of PDR1 in the cell owing to its toxically high activity. Using a set of GOF PDR1 alleles from azole-resistant clinical isolates, we have analyzed the mechanisms acting to repress Pdr1 transcriptional activity. Our data support the view that Pdr1-dependent transactivation is mediated by a complex network of transcriptional coactivators interacting with the extreme C-terminal part of Pdr1. These coactivators include but are not limited to the Mediator component Med15A. Activity of this C-terminal domain is controlled by the CRD and requires multiple regions across the C-terminus for normal function. We also provide genetic evidence for an element within the transactivation domain that mediates the interaction of Pdr1 with coactivators on one hand while restricting Pdr1 activity on the other hand. These data indicate that GOF mutations in PDR1 block nonidentical negative inputs that would otherwise restrain Pdr1 transcriptional activation. The strong C-terminal transactivation domain of Pdr1 uses multiple different protein regions to recruit coactivators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.