Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32841020›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2020

Water in Nanopores and Biological Channels: A Molecular Simulation Perspective.

Charlotte I Lynch, Shanlin Rao, Mark S P Sansom

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Friction Trumps Viscosity in Angstrofluidic Transport.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anomalous Water Flow in Sub-Nanometer Carbon Nanoconfinement.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Preorganized Electric Fields in Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte I LynchDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6619-6331
Shanlin RaoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, U.K.
Mark S P SansomDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6360-7959
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000145/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R00126X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208361/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Review explores the dynamic behavior of water within nanopores and biological channels in lipid bilayer membranes. We focus on molecular simulation studies, alongside selected structural and other experimental investigations. Structures of biological nanopores and channels are reviewed, emphasizing those high-resolution crystal structures, which reveal water molecules within the transmembrane pores, which can be used to aid the interpretation of simulation studies. Different levels of molecular simulations of water within nanopores are described, with a focus on molecular dynamics (MD). In particular, models of water for MD simulations are discussed in detail to provide an evaluation of their use in simulations of water in nanopores. Simulation studies of the behavior of water in idealized models of nanopores have revealed aspects of the organization and dynamics of nanoconfined water, including wetting/dewetting in narrow hydrophobic nanopores. A survey of simulation studies in a range of nonbiological nanopores is presented, including carbon nanotubes, synthetic nanopores, model peptide nanopores, track-etched nanopores in polymer membranes, and hydroxylated and functionalized nanoporous silica. These reveal a complex relationship between pore size/geometry, the nature of the pore lining, and rates of water transport. Wider nanopores with hydrophobic linings favor water flow whereas narrower hydrophobic pores may show dewetting. Simulation studies over the past decade of the behavior of water in a range of biological nanopores are described, including porins and β-barrel protein nanopores, aquaporins and related polar solute pores, and a number of different classes of ion channels. Water is shown to play a key role in proton transport in biological channels and in hydrophobic gating of ion channels. An overall picture emerges, whereby the behavior of water in a nanopore may be predicted as a function of its hydrophobicity and radius. This informs our understanding of the functions of diverse channel structures and will aid the design of novel nanopores. Thus, our current level of understanding allows for the design of a nanopore which promotes wetting over dewetting or vice versa. However, to design a novel nanopore, which enables fast, selective, and gated flow of water de novo would remain challenging, suggesting a need for further detailed simulations alongside experimental evaluation of more complex nanopore systems.

Indexed as

NanoporesAnimalsHumansIon ChannelsLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationWaterIon ChannelsLipid BilayersWater

Identifiers

PMID32841020
PMCPMC7517714
OpenAlexW3080989402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.