ArticleJournal of cardiac surgery2020
Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: Results in 831 patients from a single center.
Article in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mid- and Long-Term Surgical Outcomes Due to Infective Endocarditis in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study evaluated surgical outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE), with particular attention to the impact of intravenous drug use (IVDU).
methodsAdult patients undergoing surgery for IE between 2011 and 2018 at a single center were included and stratified by IVDU. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and hospital readmissions. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression were utilized for unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival analyses, respectively. Cumulative incidence function curves were compared for hospital readmissions.
resultsA total of 831 patients (mean age 55 years, 34.4% female) were operated on for IE, including 318 (38.3%) with IVDU. Cultures were most commonly positive for streptococcus (25.2%), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (17.7%), enterococcus (14.3%), or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (8.4%). The most common procedures included isolated aortic valve repair/replacement (18.8%), aortic root replacement (15.9%), mitral valve repair/replacement (26.7%), aortic and mitral valve replacement (8.4%), and tricuspid valve repair/replacement (7.6%). Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Overall 5-year survival was 64% and was similar between IVDU and non-IVDU. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that IVDU was not associated with mortality risk. IVDU patients displayed higher rates of all-cause readmission (61.6% vs 53.9%; P = .03), drug-use readmission (15.4% vs 1.4%; P < .001), and recurrent endocarditis readmission (33.0% vs 13.0%; P < .001).
conclusionsThe majority of patients undergoing surgical treatment of IE are alive at 5-years although readmission rates are high. IVDU is not a risk factor for longitudinal mortality although patients with IVDU are at higher overall readmission risk, driven largely by greater readmissions for drug-use and recurrent endocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.