ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2020
Vendor effects on murine gut microbiota and its influence on lipopolysaccharide-induced lung inflammation and Gram-negative pneumonia.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Inflammatory Response in the Murine Ovalbumin-Induced Skin Inflammation Model Is Robust Despite Major Gut Microbiota Differences.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The gut microbiota shapes the human and murine breath volatilome.Cell metabolism · 2026Article
- Dominant effects of the immediate environment on the gut microbiome of mice used in biomedical research.mSystems · 2025Article
- Effect of the gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolite indole-3-acetic acid in pneumonia.Nature communications · 2025Observational
- Spatiotemporal dynamics during niche remodeling by super-colonizing microbiota in the mammalian gut.Cell systems · 2024Article
- Influence of angiotensin II on the gut microbiome: modest effects in comparison to experimental factors.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Mouse diet and vendor impact microbiome perturbation and recovery from early-life pulses of amoxicillin.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2024Article
- Review
- The BALB/c Mouse Model for the Evaluation of Therapies to Treat Infections with AerosolizedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Resistant Potato Starch Alters the Cecal Microbiome and Gene Expression in Mice Fed a Western Diet Based on NHANES Data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Storage conditions of high-fat diets affect pulmonary inflammation.Physiological reports · 2021Article
- The microbiome and rodent models of immune mediated diseases.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021Review
- The gut microbiome of laboratory mice: considerations and best practices for translational research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021Review
- Pulmonary and intestinal microbiota dynamics during Gram-negative pneumonia-derived sepsis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2021Article
- FromMicroorganisms · 2021Review
- Differences in Gut Microbiome Composition Between Sympatric Wild and Allopatric Laboratory Populations of Omnivorous Cockroaches.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe microbiome has emerged as an important player in the pathophysiology of a whole spectrum of diseases that affect the critically ill. We hypothesized that differences in microbiota composition across vendors can influence murine models of pulmonary lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inflammation and Gram-negative pneumonia.
methodsA multi-vendor approach was used with genetically similar mice derived from three different vendors (Janvier, Envigo, Charles River). This model was employed to study the effect on the host response to a pulmonary LPS challenge (1 μg Klebsiella pneumoniae LPS, intranasal), as well as experimental K. pneumoniae infection (ATCC43816, 1 × 10
resultsGut microbiota analysis revealed profound intervendor differences in bacterial composition as shown by beta diversity and at various taxonomic levels. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 release in lung and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were determined 6 and 24 h after intranasal treatment with LPS. No differences were found between the groups, with the exception for Envigo, showing a higher level of TNFα in lung and BALF at 6 h compared to Janvier and Charles River. In another set of experiments, mice from different vendors were subjected to a clinically relevant model of Gram-negative pneumonia (K. pneumoniae). At 12 and 36 h post-infection, no intervendor differences were found in bacterial dissemination, or TNFα and IL-6 levels in the lungs. In line, markers for organ failure did not differ between groups.
conclusionsAlthough there was a marked variation in the gut microbiota composition of mice from different vendors, the hypothesized impact on our models of pulmonary inflammation and severe pneumonia was limited. This is of significance for experimental settings, showing that differences in gut microbiota do not have to lead to differences in outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.