Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32840630›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2020

Medical labour under neoliberalism: an ethnographic study in Colombia.

Adriana Ardila-Sierra, César Abadía-Barrero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriana Ardila-SierraUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. amardilas@unal.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4070-0365
César Abadía-BarreroUniversity of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT, USA.
Universidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 511-2010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn order to increase the knowledge about the impacts of neoliberal market forces on physician's labour, this article's objectives are to analyse how and why the labour of physicians is transformed by neoliberalism, and the implications of these transformations for patient care.

methodsEthnographic investigation is carried out through semi-structured interviews with 20 general practitioners at public and private facilities in Colombia. The interviews were contrasted with national studies of physician's labour since the 1960s. A "mock" job search was also simulated. The analysis was guided by Marxian frameworks. The study was approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

resultsThe overpowering for-profit administration of the Colombian healthcare system imposes productivity mechanisms on physicians as a result of a deregulated labour market characterized by low salaries, reduced and self-funded social security benefits, and job insecurity. Overworked physicians with reduced autonomy become frustrated for not being able to provide the care their patients need according to clinical standards.

conclusionsUnder neoliberal conditions, medical labour becomes exploitable and directly productive through its formal and real subsumption to Capital. The negative consequences of a progressive loss in physician's autonomy unveil the incompatibility between neoliberal health systems and people's health.

Indexed as

PoliticsAdultAnthropology, CulturalColombiaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedSalaries and Fringe BenefitsSocial SecurityClinical medicineEmploymentExploitationNeoliberalismPhysician–patient relationsQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID32840630
OpenAlexW3080470676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.