Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32840564›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

SPEARS: Standard Performance Evaluation of Ancestral haplotype Reconstruction through Simulation.

Heather Manching, Randall J Wisser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heather ManchingDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
Randall J WisserDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-0115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAncestral haplotype maps provide useful information about genomic variation and insights into biological processes. Reconstructing the descendent haplotype structure of homologous chromosomes, particularly for large numbers of individuals, can help with characterizing the recombination landscape, elucidating genotype-to-phenotype relationships, improving genomic predictions and more. Inferring haplotype maps from sparse genotype data is an efficient approach to whole-genome haplotyping, but this is a non-trivial problem. A standardized approach is needed to validate whether haplotype reconstruction software, conceived population designs and existing data for a given population provides accurate haplotype information for further inference.

resultsWe introduce SPEARS, a pipeline for the simulation-based appraisal of genome-wide haplotype maps constructed from sparse genotype data. Using a specified pedigree, the pipeline generates virtual genotypes (known data) with genotyping errors and missing data structure. It then proceeds to mimic analysis in practice, capturing sources of error due to genotyping, imputation and haplotype inference. Standard metrics allow researchers to assess different population designs and which features of haplotype structure or regions of the genome are sufficiently accurate for analysis. Haplotype maps for 1000 outcross progeny from a multi-parent population of maize are used to demonstrate SPEARS. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: SPEARS, the protocol and suite of scripts, are publicly available under an MIT license at GitHub (https://github.com/maizeatlas/spears). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomeSoftwareComputer SimulationGenotypeHaplotypesHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID32840564
PMCPMC8097754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.