Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32840020›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2020

Poststimulation Block of Pudendal Nerve Conduction by High-Frequency (kHz) Biphasic Stimulation in Cats.

Zhaoxia Wang, Natalie Pace, Haotian Cai, Bing Shen, Jicheng Wang, James R Roppolo, William C de Groat, Changfeng Tai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanisms Underlying Poststimulation Block Induced by High-Frequency Biphasic Stimulation.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Model Analysis of Post-Stimulation Effect on Axonal Conduction and Block.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021
    Article
  10. Pudendal Nerve Block by Low-Frequency (≤1 kHz) Biphasic Electrical Stimulation.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zhaoxia WangDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Natalie PaceDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Haotian CaiDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bing ShenDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jicheng WangDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
James R RoppoloDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
William C de GroatDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Changfeng TaiDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-8611
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Parasympathetic and sympathetic mechanisms underlying bladder nociceptionR01DK111382 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BECKEL, JONATHAN M · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Mechanism underlying Nerve Conduction Block by High Frequency (kHz) Biphasic StimulationR01NS109198 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TAI, CHANGFENG · 2019 to 2022
$939k
Neuromodulation for Non-Obstructive Urinary Retention (NOUR)R01DK121698 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TAI, CHANGFENG · 2019 to 2021
$704k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK111382NIDDK NIH HHS DK121698NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111382NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121698NINDS NIH HHS NS109198NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the relationship between various parameters of high-frequency biphasic stimulation (HFBS) and the recovery period of post-HFBS block of the pudendal nerve in cats. MATERIALS AND

methodsA tripolar cuff electrode was implanted on the pudendal nerve to deliver HFBS in ten cats. Two hook electrodes were placed central or distal to the cuff electrode to stimulate the pudendal nerve and induce contractions of external urethral sphincter (EUS). A catheter was inserted toward the distal urethra to slowly perfuse the urethra and record the back-up pressure generated by EUS contractions. After determining the block threshold (T), HFBS (6 or 10 kHz) of different durations (1, 5, 10, 20, 30 min) and intensities (1T or 2T) was used to produce the post-HFBS block.

resultsHFBS at 10 kHz and 1T intensity must be applied for at least 30 min to induce post-HFBS block. However, 10 kHz HFBS at a higher intensity (2T) elicited post-HFBS block after stimulation of only 10 min; and 10 kHz HFBS at 2T for 30 min induced a longer-lasting (1-3 h) post-HFBS block that fully recovered with time. HFBS of 5-min duration at 6 kHz produced a longer period (20.4 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.05, N = 5 cats) of post-HFBS block than HFBS at 10 kHz (9.5 ± 2.1 min).

conclusionHFBS of longer duration, higher intensity, and lower frequency can produce longer-lasting reversible post-HFBS block. This study is important for developing new methods to block nerve conduction by HFBS.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationNerve BlockNeural ConductionPudendal NerveAnimalsCatsFemaleMaleUrethraBlockcathigh-frequencynervestimulation

Identifiers

PMID32840020
PMCPMC7447838
OpenAlexW2987316956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.