Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839957›Full record

Trial reportCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2020

Examining the Role of Lateral Parietal Cortex in Emotional Distancing Using TMS.

John P Powers, Simon W Davis, Andrada D Neacsiu, Lysianne Beynel, Lawrence G Appelbaum, Kevin S LaBar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03698591 (Testing a Neurocognitive Model of Distancing Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03698591 nacompletednot on this map

Testing a Neurocognitive Model of Distancing Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsEmotion Regulation, Real Versus Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)ArmsTranscranial magnetic stimulation task, Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John P PowersDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708-0999, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1471-6259
Simon W DavisDepartment of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Andrada D NeacsiuDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Lysianne BeynelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Lawrence G AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kevin S LaBarDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708-0999, USA. klabar@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently proposed a neurocognitive model of distancing-an emotion regulation tactic-with a focus on the lateral parietal cortex. Although this brain area has been implicated in both cognitive control and self-projection processes during distancing, fMRI work suggests that these processes may be dissociable here. This preregistered (NCT03698591) study tested the contribution of left temporoparietal junction (TPJ) to distancing using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. We hypothesized that inhibiting left TPJ would decrease the efficiency of distancing but not distraction, another regulation tactic with similar cognitive control requirements, thus implicating this region in the self-projection processes unique to distancing. Active and sham continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) were applied to 30 healthy adults in a single-session crossover design. Tactic efficiency was measured using online reports of valence and effort. The stimulation target was established from the group TPJ fMRI activation peak in an independent sample using the same distancing task, and anatomical MRI scans were used for individual targeting. Analyses employed both repeated-measures ANOVA and analytic procedures tailored to crossover designs. Irrespective of cTBS, distancing led to greater decreases in negative valence over time relative to distraction, and distancing effort decreased over time while distraction effort remained stable. Exploratory analyses also revealed that active cTBS made distancing more effortful, but not distraction. Thus, left TPJ seems to support self-projection processes in distancing, and these processes may be facilitated by repeated use. These findings help to clarify the role of lateral parietal cortex in distancing and inform applications of distancing and distraction.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultAffectAttentionCross-Over StudiesEmotional RegulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultContinuous theta burst stimulationEmotion regulationPsychological distanceReappraisalTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32839957
OpenAlexW3081008835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.