Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839933›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire.

Graham Albert, George B Richardson, Steven Arnocky, Zeynep Senveli, Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Validating the Revised Mating Effort Questionnaire.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Longitudinal Associations Between Primary and Secondary Psychopathic Traits, Delinquency, and Current Dating Status in Adolescence.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
  6. Life History, Attachment and Romantic Relationship Outcomes in an Eastern European Adult Sample.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Graham AlbertDepartment of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Rd., Boston, MA, 02215, USA. grahama@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-7479
George B RichardsonSchool of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Steven ArnockyDepartment of Psychology, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada.
Zeynep SenveliDepartment of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Rd., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Carolyn R Hodges-SimeonDepartment of Anthropology, Boston University, 232 Bay State Rd., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we review the psychometric literature on mating effort and find that extant instruments (1) have not been adequately evaluated in terms of internal structure and measurement invariance, and (2) disproportionately focus on mate retention and intrasexual competition tactics designed to repel competitors, relative to attraction and investment effort. To address these gaps in the literature, we carried out two studies to develop and validate a new Mating Effort Questionnaire (MEQ). In Study 1, we report a pilot study in which participants' responses to an item pool were submitted to exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, we replicated the structure found in Study 1 using confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. A three-factor solution yielded the best fit. The three factors reflected respondents' allocation of energy to attracting high mate value partners when already mated, seeking out romantic partners when single, and investing in their current romantic partner and relationships. Strong partial measurement invariance held across the sexes, implying that observed scores may be used to compare them. We also found evidence of concurrent validity via associations between the MEQ and constructs such as sociosexual orientation, K-factor, mate retention behaviors, and respondents' sexual behavior. These findings suggest that the MEQ is a valid and novel measure of individual differences in mating effort which is well suited to complement existing mating effort measures.

Indexed as

Internal-External ControlAdolescentAdultCourtshipFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGender IdentityHumansMalePilot ProjectsPsychometricsSelf ConceptSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesHuman matingLife historyMating effortMeasurement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.