Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839919›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2020

Fit-for-Purpose Validation and Establishment of Assay Acceptance and Reporting Criteria of Dendritic Cell Activation Assay Contributing to the Assessment of Immunogenicity Risk.

Dilki Wickramarachchi, Gregory Steeno, Zhiping You, Saleem Shaik, Christopher Lepsy, Li Xue

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dilki WickramarachchiImmunogenicity Sciences, Biomedicine Design, Worldwide Research, Development & Medical, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Gregory SteenoNonclinical Biostatistics, Early Clinical Development, Worldwide Research, Development & Medical, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Zhiping YouNonclinical Biostatistics, Early Clinical Development, Worldwide Research, Development & Medical, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Saleem ShaikImmunogenicity Sciences, Biomedicine Design, Worldwide Research, Development & Medical, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher LepsyImmunogenicity Sciences, Biomedicine Design, Worldwide Research, Development & Medical, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Li XueImmunogenicity Sciences, Biomedicine Design, Worldwide Research, Development & Medical, Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA. xueli08@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validation of key analytical and functional performance characteristics of in vitro immunogenicity risk assessment assays increases our confidence in utilizing them for screening biotherapeutics. Herein, we present a fit-for-purpose (FFP) validation of a dendritic cell (DC) activation assay designed to assess the immunogenicity liability of protein biotherapeutics. Characterization of key assay parameters was achieved using monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs) treated with cell culture medium only (i.e., background control (BC)), keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as system positive control (SPC), and 2 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with known clinical immunogenicity profiles (bococizumab and TAM163) as therapeutic controls (TCs). In the absence of established validation guidelines for primary cell-based assays, the present DC activation assay was validated using a novel FFP approach which allows more flexibility in selection of validation parameters and designing of experiments based on the intended use of the assay. The present FFP validation allowed us to understand the impact of experimental variables on assay precision, develop a clear concise readout for DC activation results, establish a reliable response threshold to define a result as a positive DC activation response, and define in-study donor acceptance criteria and cohort size. FFP validation of this DC activation assay indicated that the assay is sufficient to support its context of use, a preclinical immunogenicity risk management tool.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDendritic CellsDrug EvaluationHumansImmunogeneticsRisk AssessmentBiological Productsacceptance and reporting criteriaDC activation assayfit-for-purpose validationimmunogenicityscreening and risk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.