Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839888›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Automatic segmentation of the carotid artery and internal jugular vein from 2D ultrasound images for 3D vascular reconstruction.

Leah A Groves, Blake VanBerlo, Natan Veinberg, Abdulrahman Alboog, Terry M Peters, Elvis C S Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Super-resolution of 2D ultrasound images and videos.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah A GrovesSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Canada. lgroves6@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-9190
Blake VanBerloSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Natan VeinbergSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Abdulrahman AlboogDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London, Canada.
Terry M PetersDepartment of Medical Biophysics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Robarts Research, London, Canada.
Elvis C S ChenDepartment of Medical Biophysics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Robarts Research, London, Canada.
Western University · CARobarts Clinical Trials · CA

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 20994Government of Ontario IDCD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the context of analyzing neck vascular morphology, this work formulates and compares Mask R-CNN and U-Net-based algorithms to automatically segment the carotid artery (CA) and internal jugular vein (IJV) from transverse neck ultrasound (US).

methodsUS scans of the neck vasculature were collected to produce a dataset of 2439 images and their respective manual segmentations. Fourfold cross-validation was employed to train and evaluate Mask RCNN and U-Net models. The U-Net algorithm includes a post-processing step that selects the largest connected segmentation for each class. A Mask R-CNN-based vascular reconstruction pipeline was validated by performing a surface-to-surface distance comparison between US and CT reconstructions from the same patient.

resultsThe average CA and IJV Dice scores produced by the Mask R-CNN across the evaluation data from all four sets were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The average Dice scores produced by the post-processed U-Net were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], for the CA and IJV, respectively. The reconstruction algorithm utilizing the Mask R-CNN was capable of producing accurate 3D reconstructions with majority of US reconstruction surface points being within 2 mm of the CT equivalent.

conclusionsOn average, the Mask R-CNN produced more accurate vascular segmentations compared to U-Net. The Mask R-CNN models were used to produce 3D reconstructed vasculature with a similar accuracy to that of a manually segmented CT scan. This implementation of the Mask R-CNN network enables automatic analysis of the neck vasculature and facilitates 3D vascular reconstruction.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsCarotid ArteriesDeep LearningHumansJugular VeinsUltrasonographyAutomatic segmentationDeep learningSurface reconstructionSurgical guidanceUSVasculature

Identifiers

PMID32839888
OpenAlexW3081225194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.