ArticleThe EPMA journal2020
Optimal multiparametric set-up modelled for best survival outcomes in palliative treatment of liver malignancies: unsupervised machine learning and 3 PM recommendations.
Article in The EPMA journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapy-resistant breast cancer in focus: Clinically relevant mitigation by flavonoids targeting cancer stem cells.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Flavonoid-modulated JAK-STAT signaling mitigates malignant transformation and drug resistance in breast tumors: A clinically relevant 3PM-guided innovation.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Multi-omic profiling reveals potential biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis and therapy response among mitochondria-associated cell death genes in the context of 3P medicine.The EPMA journal · 2024Article
- Article
- IQGAP3 is relevant to prostate cancer: A detailed presentation of potential pathomechanisms.Journal of advanced research · 2023Article
- Review
- Anti-prostate cancer protection and therapy in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine - comprehensive effects of phytochemicals in primary, secondary and tertiary care.The EPMA journal · 2022Review
- Novel Markers for Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Management: Circulating Platelets and Extracellular Vesicles.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2022Review
- Longwise Cluster Analysis for the Prediction of COVID-19 Severity within 72 h of Admission: COVID-DATA-SAVE-LIFES Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Personalization of medical treatments in oncology: time for rethinking the disease concept to improve individual outcomes.The EPMA journal · 2021Review
- Flavonoids against non-physiologic inflammation attributed to cancer initiation, development, and progression-3PM pathways.The EPMA journal · 2021Review
- Abscopal Effects in Metastatic Cancer: Is a Predictive Approach Possible to Improve Individual Outcomes?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Caution, "normal" BMI: health risks associated with potentially masked individual underweight-EPMA Position Paper 2021.The EPMA journal · 2021Article
- Flavonoids as an effective sensitizer for anti-cancer therapy: insights into multi-faceted mechanisms and applicability towards individualized patient profiles.The EPMA journal · 2021Review
- Mitochondrial impairments in aetiopathology of multifactorial diseases: common origin but individual outcomes in context of 3P medicine.The EPMA journal · 2021Review
- Mitochondriopathies as a Clue to Systemic Disorders-Analytical Tools and Mitigating Measures in Context of Predictive, Preventive, and Personalized (3P) Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Association Between Pre-Treatment and Post-Treatment 3-Month Red Cell Distribution Width with Three-Year Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Can Predict Total Death After Radiofrequency Ablation in Liver Cancer Patients.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Models to Improve the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: A Multicenter External Validation Study.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Carotenoids in Cancer Metastasis-Status Quo and Outlook.Biomolecules · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, a rapid rise in deaths due to liver disease has been observed especially amongst young people. Nowadays liver disease accounts for approximately 2 million deaths per year worldwide: 1 million due to complications of cirrhosis and 1 million due to viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Besides primary liver malignancies, almost all solid tumours are capable to spread metastases to the liver, in particular, gastrointestinal cancers, breast and genitourinary cancers, lung cancer, melanomas and sarcomas. A big portion of liver malignancies undergo palliative care. To this end, the paradigm of the palliative care in the liver cancer management is evolving from "just end of the life" care to careful evaluation of all aspects relevant for the survivorship. In the presented study, an evidence-based approach has been taken to target molecular pathways and subcellular components for modelling most optimal conditions with the longest survival rates for patients diagnosed with advanced liver malignancies who underwent palliative treatments. We developed an unsupervised machine learning (UML) approach to robustly identify patient subgroups based on estimated survival curves for each individual patient and each individual potential biomarker. UML using consensus hierarchical clustering of biomarker derived risk profiles resulted into 3 stable patient subgroups. There were no significant differences in age, gender, therapy, diagnosis or comorbidities across clusters. Survival times across clusters differed significantly. Furthermore, several of the biomarkers demonstrated highly significant pairwise differences between clusters after correction for multiple testing, namely, "comet assay" patterns of classes I, III, IV and expression rates of calgranulin A (S100), SOD2 and profilin-all measured ex vivo in circulating leucocytes. Considering worst, intermediate and best survival curves with regard to identified clusters and corresponding patterns of parameters measured, clear differences were found for "comet assay" and S100 expression patterns. In conclusion, multi-faceted cancer control within the palliative care of liver malignancies is crucial for improved disease outcomes including individualised patient profiling, predictive models and implementation of corresponding cost-effective risks mitigating measures detailed in the paper. The "proof-of-principle" model is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.