Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839619›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2020

A population-based phenome-wide association study of cardiac and aortic structure and function.

Wenjia Bai, Hideaki Suzuki, Jian Huang, Catherine Francis, Shuo Wang, Giacomo Tarroni, Florian Guitton, Nay Aung, Kenneth Fung, Steffen E Petersen and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
35.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebral perfusion features linking subclinical cardiac and aortic dysfunction to vascular brain injury.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenjia BaiData Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. w.bai@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2943-7698
Hideaki SuzukiDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jian HuangMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-5013
Catherine FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Shuo WangData Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-8783
Giacomo TarroniBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Florian GuittonData Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-6620
Nay AungNIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Kenneth FungNIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-1697
Steffen E PetersenNIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-5160
Stefan K PiechnikNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stefan NeubauerNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Evangelos EvangelouMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abbas DehghanMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Declan P O'ReganMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-0270
Martin R WilkinsNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-1171
Yike GuoData Science Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul M MatthewsDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Daniel RueckertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-5889
Imperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCity, University of London · GBInstitute of Group Analysis · GBMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBTohoku University · JPUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/81/31817British Heart Foundation NH/17/1/32725British Heart Foundation PG/14/89/31194British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215British Heart Foundation RG/19/6/34387Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC-A651-53301Medical Research Council MC_U120085815Wellcome Trust 203553Wellcome Trust 203553/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206046/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in cardiac and aortic structure and function are associated with cardiovascular diseases and a wide range of other types of disease. Here we analyzed cardiovascular magnetic resonance images from a population-based study, the UK Biobank, using an automated machine-learning-based analysis pipeline. We report a comprehensive range of structural and functional phenotypes for the heart and aorta across 26,893 participants, and explore how these phenotypes vary according to sex, age and major cardiovascular risk factors. We extended this analysis with a phenome-wide association study, in which we tested for correlations of a wide range of non-imaging phenotypes of the participants with imaging phenotypes. We further explored the associations of imaging phenotypes with early-life factors, mental health and cognitive function using both observational analysis and Mendelian randomization. Our study illustrates how population-based cardiac and aortic imaging phenotypes can be used to better define cardiovascular disease risks as well as heart-brain health interactions, highlighting new opportunities for studying disease mechanisms and developing image-based biomarkers.

Indexed as

PhenomicsAge FactorsAnatomy, Cross-SectionalAortaBiological Specimen BanksCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHeartHeart Function TestsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID32839619
PMCPMC7613250
OpenAlexW3081407028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.