ArticleNature neuroscience2020
Prediction errors bidirectionally bias time perception.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The temporal context in bayesian models of interval timing: Recent advances and future directions.Behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Performance-gated deliberation: A context-adapted strategy in which urgency is opportunity cost.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Increased elasticity of sucrose demand during hyperdopaminergic states in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Entropy, Amnesia, and Abnormal Déjà Experiences.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Using adaptive psychophysics to identify the neural network reset time in subsecond interval timing.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Dopamine and the interdependency of time perception and reward.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Awareness of errors and feedback in human time estimation.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time perception and prediction errors are essential for everyday life. We hypothesized that their putative shared circuitry in the striatum might enable these two functions to interact. We show that positive and negative prediction errors bias time perception by increasing and decreasing perceived time, respectively. Imaging and behavioral modeling identify this interaction to occur in the putamen. Depending on context, this interaction may have beneficial or adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32839618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.