Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839565›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2020

Multidimensional processing in the amygdala.

Katalin M Gothard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effects of childhood adversity: Two specific neural patterns.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Comparative neuroanatomy of emotion expression: from flies to humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Amygdala and Politics.Brain sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novelty, Ecological Relevance, and Sexual Receptivity Modulate Neuronal Interactions between the Amygdala and Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Saccade-related LFP power transients in the primate amygdala and hippocampus linked to the perception of social status.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katalin M GothardDepartment of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. kgothard@email.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-2985

Funding

The Impact of Oxytocin on the Neural Representation Social Stimuli P50MH100023 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, LARRY J · 2013 to 2022
$21.8M
The Role of the Primate Amygdala in Social and Affective TouchR01MH121009 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GOTHARD, KATALIN M · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
The role of The Amygdala in Affective and Social TouchR56MH115681 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GOTHARD, KATALIN M · 2018 to 2018
$455k
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121009NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH115681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-wide circuits that coordinate affective and social behaviours intersect in the amygdala. Consequently, amygdala lesions cause a heterogeneous array of social and non-social deficits. Social behaviours are not localized to subdivisions of the amygdala even though the inputs and outputs that carry social signals are anatomically restricted to distinct subnuclear regions. This observation may be explained by the multidimensional response properties of the component neurons. Indeed, the multitudes of circuits that converge in the amygdala enlist the same subset of neurons into different ensembles that combine social and non-social elements into high-dimensional representations. These representations may enable flexible, context-dependent social decisions. As such, multidimensional processing may operate in parallel with subcircuits of genetically identical neurons that serve specialized and functionally dissociable functions. When combined, the activity of specialized circuits may grant specificity to social behaviours, whereas multidimensional processing facilitates the flexibility and nuance needed for complex social behaviour.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAmygdalaAnimalsCognitionHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeurons

Identifiers

PMID32839565
PMCPMC7714370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.