ArticleScientific reports2020
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cardia cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Derivation and validation of a nomogram for predicting nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia among older hospitalized patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Trial
- Construction of a novel nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with Siewert type II AEG based on LODDS: a study based on the seer database and external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Neural network-based prognostic predictive tool for gastric cardiac cancer: the worldwide retrospective study.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of a novel nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Predicting completion of clinical trials in pregnant women: Cox proportional hazard and neural network models.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Prognostic nomogram for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction patients with and without neoadjuvant radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Establishment and Validation of an Integrated Model to Predict Postoperative Recurrence in Patients With Atypical Meningioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- A Novel Predictive Tool for Determining the Risk of Early Death From Stage IV Endometrial Carcinoma: A Large Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our goal was to develop a prognostic nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with gastric cardia cancer (GCC). Patients diagnosed with GCC from 2004 to 2015 were screened from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. A nomogram was developed based on the variables associated with OS and CSS using multivariate Cox analysis regression models, which predicted 3- and 5-year OS and CSS. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA), and the nomogram was calibrated for 3- and 5-year OS and CSS. A total of 7,332 GCC patients were identified and randomized into a training cohort (5,231, 70%) and a validation cohort (2,200, 30%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that marital status, race, SEER stage, grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, tumor size, and surgery were independent risk factors for OS and CSS in GCC patients. Based on the multivariate Cox regression results, we constructed prognostic nomograms of OS and CSS. In the training cohort, the C-index for the OS nomogram was 0.714 (95% CI = 0.705-0.723), and the C-index for the CSS nomogram was 0.759 (95% CI = 0.746-0.772). In the validation cohort, the C-index for the OS nomogram was 0.734 (95% CI = 0.721-0.747), while the C-index for the CSS nomogram was 0.780 (95% CI = 0.759-0.801). Our nomogram has better prediction than the nomogram based on TNM stage. In addition, in the training and external validation cohorts, the calibration curves of the nomogram showed good consistency between the predicted and actual 3- and 5-year OS and CSS rates. The nomogram can effectively predict OS and CSS in GCC patients, which may help clinicians personalize prognostic assessments and clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.