Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Acapsular Staphylococcus aureus with a non-functional agr regains capsule expression after passage through the bloodstream in a bacteremia mouse model.

Carlos M Suligoy, Rocío E Díaz, Ana-Katharina Gehrke, Natalie Ring, Gonzalo Yebra, Joana Alves, Marisa I Gómez, Sindy Wendler, J Ross Fitzgerald, Lorena Tuchscherr and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos M SuligoyInstituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica (IMPaM UBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rocío E DíazInstituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica (IMPaM UBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana-Katharina GehrkeDepartamento de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Biotecnológicas, Centro de Estudios Biomédicos, Biotecnológicos, Ambientales y de Diagnóstico (CEBBAD), Universidad Maimónides and CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Natalie RingThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK.
Gonzalo YebraThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK.
Joana AlvesThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK.
Marisa I GómezDepartamento de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Biotecnológicas, Centro de Estudios Biomédicos, Biotecnológicos, Ambientales y de Diagnóstico (CEBBAD), Universidad Maimónides and CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sindy WendlerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
J Ross FitzgeraldThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK.
Lorena TuchscherrInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Bettina LöfflerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Daniel O SordelliInstituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica (IMPaM UBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. dsordelli@yahoo.com.
Mariángeles Noto LlanaInstituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica (IMPaM UBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernanda R BuzzolaInstituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica (IMPaM UBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARJena University Hospital · DERoslin Institute · GBUniversidad Maimónides · ARUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK) BB/K00638X/1Medical Research Council MR/N02995X/1Medical Research Council (UK) MR/N02995X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 201531/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection pressures exerted on Staphylococcus aureus by host factors during infection may lead to the emergence of regulatory phenotypes better adapted to the infection site. Traits convenient for persistence may be fixed by mutation thus turning these mutants into microevolution endpoints. The feasibility that stable, non-encapsulated S. aureus mutants can regain expression of key virulence factors for survival in the bloodstream was investigated. S. aureus agr mutant HU-14 (IS256 insertion in agrC) from a patient with chronic osteomyelitis was passed through the bloodstream using a bacteriemia mouse model and derivative P3.1 was obtained. Although IS256 remained inserted in agrC, P3.1 regained production of capsular polysaccharide type 5 (CP5) and staphyloxanthin. Furthermore, P3.1 expressed higher levels of asp23/SigB when compared with parental strain HU-14. Strain P3.1 displayed decreased osteoclastogenesis capacity, thus indicating decreased adaptability to bone compared with strain HU-14 and exhibited a trend to be more virulent than parental strain HU-14. Strain P3.1 exhibited the loss of one IS256 copy, which was originally located in the HU-14 noncoding region between dnaG (DNA primase) and rpoD (sigA). This loss may be associated with the observed phenotype change but the mechanism remains unknown. In conclusion, S. aureus organisms that escape the infected bone may recover the expression of key virulence factors through a rapid microevolution pathway involving SigB regulation of key virulence factors.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial CapsulesBacterial ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHumansMaleMiceOsteomyelitisSequence DeletionStaphylococcus aureusTrans-ActivatorsAgr protein, Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinscapsular polysaccharide, type 5, Staphylococcus aureusstaphyloxanthinTrans-ActivatorsVirulence FactorsXanthophylls

Identifiers

PMID32839485
PMCPMC7445255
OpenAlexW3080710666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.