Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839414›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Roles of Cannabinoids in Melanoma: Evidence from In Vivo Studies.

Ava Bachari, Terrence J Piva, Seyed Alireza Salami, Negar Jamshidi, Nitin Mantri

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Effect of Dietary Factors on Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ava BachariSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9864-2794
Terrence J PivaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0343-1781
Seyed Alireza SalamiFaculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj 31587, Iran.
Negar JamshidiSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Nitin MantriSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-035X
RMIT University · AUUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

MGC Pharmaceuticals Limited Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is the fourth most common type of cancer diagnosed in Australians after breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. While there has been substantial progress in the treatment of cancer in general, malignant melanoma, in particular, is resistant to existing medical therapies requiring an urgent need to develop effective treatments with lesser side effects. Several studies have shown that "cannabinoids", the major compounds of the

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicApoptosisCannabinoidsCell ProliferationClinical Trials as TopicCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDisease Models, AnimalHumansMelanocytesMelanomaMiceSkin NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTumor BurdenTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCannabinoidsapoptosiscannabinoidsCBDmedicinal herbsmelanomaTHC

Identifiers

PMID32839414
PMCPMC7503316
OpenAlexW3080564166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.