Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839329›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

The duration of travel impacts the spatial dynamics of infectious diseases.

John R Giles, Elisabeth Zu Erbach-Schoenberg, Andrew J Tatem, Lauren Gardner, Ottar N Bjørnstad, C J E Metcalf, Amy Wesolowski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. QnAs with Lauren M. Gardner: Winner of the 2022 Lasker-Bloomberg Public Service Award.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John R GilesDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205; giles@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0954-4093
Elisabeth Zu Erbach-SchoenbergDepartment of Geography and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Andrew J TatemDepartment of Geography and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7270-941X
Lauren GardnerDepartment of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Ottar N BjørnstadDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-3753
C J E MetcalfDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0003-3166-7521
Amy WesolowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-3575
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Southampton · GBPennsylvania State University · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Disease Emergence and Elimination: Using Mobility Data to Inform Spatial Disease DynamicsDP2LM013102 · NLM · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WESOLOWSKI, AMY · 2018 to 2018
$2.5M
NLM NIH HHS DP2 LM013102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can impact the spatial transmission dynamics of infectious diseases by introducing pathogens into susceptible environments. The rate at which this occurs depends in part on human-mobility patterns. Increasingly, mobile-phone usage data are used to quantify human mobility and investigate the impact on disease dynamics. Although the number of trips between locations and the duration of those trips could both affect infectious-disease dynamics, there has been limited work to quantify and model the duration of travel in the context of disease transmission. Using mobility data inferred from mobile-phone calling records in Namibia, we calculated both the number of trips between districts and the duration of these trips from 2010 to 2014. We fit hierarchical Bayesian models to these data to describe both the mean trip number and duration. Results indicate that trip duration is positively related to trip distance, but negatively related to the destination population density. The highest volume of trips and shortest trip durations were among high-density districts, whereas trips among low-density districts had lower volume with longer duration. We also analyzed the impact of including trip duration in spatial-transmission models for a range of pathogens and introduction locations. We found that inclusion of trip duration generally delays the rate of introduction, regardless of pathogen, and that the variance and uncertainty around spatial spread increases proportionally with pathogen-generation time. These results enhance our understanding of disease-dispersal dynamics driven by human mobility, which has potential to elucidate optimal spatial and temporal scales for epidemic interventions.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesEpidemicsTravelCell Phone UseHumansModels, StatisticalNamibiaSpatio-Temporal Analysiscall data recordshuman mobilityspatial disease dynamicsspatial TSIRtrip duration

Identifiers

PMID32839329
PMCPMC7486699
OpenAlexW3081310753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.