Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32839303›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Objective assessment of stored blood quality by deep learning.

Minh Doan, Joseph A Sebastian, Juan C Caicedo, Stefanie Siegert, Aline Roch, Tracey R Turner, Olga Mykhailova, Ruben N Pinto, Claire McQuin, Allen Goodman and 9 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Unbiased Morphometric Assessment of Red Blood Cell Storage Lesion in the Presence of Shear-Induced Stomatocytes.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Minh DoanImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Joseph A SebastianDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Juan C CaicedoImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Stefanie SiegertFlow Cytometry Facility, Department of Formation and Research, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aline RochDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Tracey R TurnerCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8389-6161
Olga MykhailovaCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8854-2872
Ruben N PintoDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Claire McQuinImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Allen GoodmanImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Michael J ParsonsFlow Cytometry Core Facilities, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Olaf WolkenhauerDepartment of Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Holger HennigDepartment of Systems Biology & Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4272-2445
Shantanu SinghImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Anne WilsonFlow Cytometry Facility, Department of Formation and Research, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jason P AckerCentre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R8, Canada.
Paul ReesImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Michael C KoliosDepartment of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada; mkolios@ryerson.ca anne@broadinstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-8293
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; mkolios@ryerson.ca anne@broadinstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-8261

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N005163Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P026818/1CIHR 315271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stored red blood cells (RBCs) are needed for life-saving blood transfusions, but they undergo continuous degradation. RBC storage lesions are often assessed by microscopic examination or biochemical and biophysical assays, which are complex, time-consuming, and destructive to fragile cells. Here we demonstrate the use of label-free imaging flow cytometry and deep learning to characterize RBC lesions. Using brightfield images, a trained neural network achieved 76.7% agreement with experts in classifying seven clinically relevant RBC morphologies associated with storage lesions, comparable to 82.5% agreement between different experts. Given that human observation and classification may not optimally discern RBC quality, we went further and eliminated subjective human annotation in the training step by training a weakly supervised neural network using only storage duration times. The feature space extracted by this network revealed a chronological progression of morphological changes that better predicted blood quality, as measured by physiological hemolytic assay readouts, than the conventional expert-assessed morphology classification system. With further training and clinical testing across multiple sites, protocols, and instruments, deep learning and label-free imaging flow cytometry might be used to routinely and objectively assess RBC storage lesions. This would automate a complex protocol, minimize laboratory sample handling and preparation, and reduce the impact of procedural errors and discrepancies between facilities and blood donors. The chronology-based machine-learning approach may also improve upon humans' assessment of morphological changes in other biomedically important progressions, such as differentiation and metastasis.

Indexed as

Blood BanksDeep LearningErythrocytesHumanscell morphologydeep learningstored blood qualityweakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID32839303
PMCPMC7474613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.